On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Steve
wrote:
> > I’m curious—perhaps someone would want to undergo the pain of comparing
> our 4.1.2 with
> > LibreOffice’s 5.0.1? A task somewhat beside the point. But possibly of
> marketing use. And also a means
> > by which we
Just a reminder that we have an OpenOffice Events calendar that could
use some updating. This calendar on the Cwiki needs participation by
everybody to keep it up to date. Anyone of our community attending an
open source event is certainly welcome to add the event to this wiki
page. It's a good
> On 06 Sep 15, at 14:39, Steve wrote:
>
>> I’m curious—perhaps someone would want to undergo the pain of comparing our
>> 4.1.2 with
>> LibreOffice’s 5.0.1? A task somewhat beside the point. But possibly of
>> marketing use. And also a means
>> by which we
Dennis,
Thanks for the information
If there are no -1's I'll report back after I look into all the
requirements.
Thanks,
Carl
On 09/05/2015 10:59 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Thanks for the information, Carl.
The labeling and naming of the jar files may need to be considered, as well as
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:29:39 +0100 (BST)
"dave98...@btinternet.com" wrote:
> Hi
> Not sure if you are the correct department but found it a bit difficult to
> get contact details.
> I have use open office for a long while and find it very good, but after the
> last
Hi
Not sure if you are the correct department but found it a bit difficult to get
contact details.
I have use open office for a long while and find it very good, but after the
last update the spell check on writer, calc and others has stopped working I
also cannot set a language under the
On 09/05/2015 01:46 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
First of all +1.
This is a great idea because there are several Apache Projects like
Apache Ofbiz need such files to support within their own projects
deprecated such support do to the lack of availability and the
(previous) copyleft
Andrea,
On reflection, we were not comfortable with the previously published
"Application Choices" table, we feel it was not fully considered, so it
will be replaced in this version. I have included the proposed
replacement table at the end of this email
We don't CC you on all replies, but
> I’m curious—perhaps someone would want to undergo the pain of comparing our
> 4.1.2 with
> LibreOffice’s 5.0.1? A task somewhat beside the point. But possibly of
> marketing use. And also a means
> by which we and others can evaluate what is meant by our respective releases.
Keep in mind that