Re: Resetting feedback the extension directory?

2016-01-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2016-01-09 20:40 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schmidt : > Hello, > > Is it possible reset the feedback on 4.x compatibility the extension > directory? > Sure, done. Roberto > > What is the problem? > For Basic Addon Builder voted on compatibility, as no compatible version > was

Re: Norwegian translation for website

2016-01-10 Thread Marcus
Am 01/09/2016 11:57 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Am 01/08/2016 12:05 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: By the way, Marcus, while you are at it, we also have a eu-test to eu transition ready (see l10n list). OK, haven't seen this so far. Seeing that the "eu" one was just a svn mv, I

Re: Resetting feedback the extension directory?

2016-01-10 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com] > > Is it possible reset the feedback on 4.x compatibility the extension > > directory? > > > > Sure, done. Fine. Thank you. Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: BasicAddonBuilder 0.5.2 released

2016-01-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2016-01-09 20:25 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schmidt : > Hello, > > After over a year testing, i have today released Basic Addon Builder > 0.5.2, see: > > http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/basicaddonbuilder-extensions-packager#releases > > This version is compatible with AOO

Re: Updating the WHY section of www.openoffice.org

2016-01-10 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I am +1 for also looking at the why_new_computers page as Jan suggests. > > Telling people that AOO is free is not the issue. > > Where it is an advantage is a matter for users to decide. We should let them > judge

Re: Updating the WHY section of www.openoffice.org

2016-01-10 Thread donaldupre .
The "Why" page is important and shouldn't be discarded. The advantages over MS Office are obvious... It is far less obvious how AOO is currently better than LO / Gnome Office / Calligra Suite. The references to scientific papers in Gnumeric home page are a good example for a convincing "Why" page.

Re: Updating the WHY section of www.openoffice.org

2016-01-10 Thread Jan Høydahl
Agree with Rob and Andrea that the pages serve a purpose. My reason for filing the original bug was simply that during translation into Norwegian, I saw several pages were outdated, talking about MSO 2003 EOL etc. Instead of discussing details of wording here, why don’t someone who cares for