What happens if you ignore the assertion and carry on?
I had to do that for several assertions when debugging some security
problems - the problems I was working were higher priority.
On 1/9/2020 1:35 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
To be clear the Assert is a different issue and needs more
I hope you are not seriously considering changing names that have been
the same as long as I can remember (well, maybe not quite back to
Visicalc, the first spread sheet I used).
On 4/10/2020 6:03 AM, BMCS wrote:
On 10/04/2020 13:03, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Am 10.04.20 um 13:02 schrieb Dave:
.
Regards
Dave
On 10/04/2020 14:35, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I hope you are not seriously considering changing names that have been
the same as long as I can remember (well, maybe not quite back to
Visicalc, the first spread sheet I used).
On 4/10/2020 6:03 AM, BMCS wrote:
On 10/04/2020 13:03
Without knowing enough about the merits of the different build systems
we got where we are through a history in which a new build system is
selected every N years, but it takes more than N years to fully switch.
My recommendation is to pick one of the existing build systems, and get
On 4/15/2020 10:08 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
We are also thin on new contributors, and I recall you saying they're
largely scared off by the current build system.
Two
Thanks. I had hoped to get more active in AOO, but will be giving
priority to board activities for my Apache time.
On 4/5/2020 8:27 AM, Marcus wrote:
I want to take the chance to congratulate Patricia for electing.
Great to see that one of our circle is engaged in the ASF Board of
directors.
On 4/26/2020 4:05 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hallo all,
We have some pull request (patches) signed in on Github.
We need people to test them and sign them off.
Matthias should not sign everything on his own. I am volunteering here,
but the question is:
Who else can I count into?
Do you
/pmc-faqs.html
Regards,
Matthias
I think Keith mentioned in another thread that he was an admin in the
mwiki.
Thanks,
Carl
On 5/16/20 7:59 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I think we need to make a list of powers the PMC chair should have.
That should include adding administrators etc. for all
On 5/17/2020 3:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 17.05.20 um 23:13 schrieb Brian Barker:
At 16:55 17/05/2020 -0400, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update
for its leading open source office suite.
The changes look good except that its should be
I think we need to make a list of powers the PMC chair should have. That
should include adding administrators etc. for all the OpenOffice
resources. Part of handing over the chair should be making the new chair
administrator for each resource.
On 5/16/2020 3:29 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
On 9/12/2020 12:46 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:36 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: we are a ASF-project
On 9/12/2020 12:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
This is about
On 9/12/2020 12:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
This is about the subject line, not the content. I don't usually do
spelling and grammar, but that seems to be the main content. As a native
English speaker, that subject line makes me cringe every time I see it.
It should be "we are a
This is about the subject line, not the content. I don't usually do
spelling and grammar, but that seems to be the main content. As a native
English speaker, that subject line makes me cringe every time I see it.
It should be "we are an ASF-project".
I have been working on a bug, and have reached the conclusion that a fix
will require changes to the parsing of XML and recording of event
actions. I am seriously handicapped in making progress on this because
that happens in the depths of UNO, and I have zero UNO knowledge.
Can anyone help?
On 9/12/2020 12:37 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello Patricia,
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 9:20 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: we are a ASF-project
This is about the subject line, not the content
On 7/1/2020 6:06 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
...
And there should be no doubt:
Detlef undoubtedly deserves to be a committer, only others have that to the
same degree. And whoever apparently excludes these others from it(*), makes his
opinion clear.
This is intended for all AOO participants, not
I got distracted, and forgot to post the only appropriate form of
message for a "New Committer" thread:
Detlef, welcome to the AOO committer team.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
-
To
On 7/6/2020 12:14 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
...
My criticism concerned the PMC's approach in the present case. I would have
simply wished for equal treatment of equal volunteer work, or some other
justification (and I have explained what this justification could have been
using the example of
On 7/7/2020 8:18 AM, Peter wrote:
Dear Pedro,
Am 07.07.20 um 12:14 schrieb Pedro Lino:
As a member of this project I kindly request that people do not make
presentations in German.
English is the lingua franca and everybody in this project regardless
of nationality makes an effort to
on *nix too, where dmake doesn't provide full paths to
filenames, breaking debugging.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 9:35 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 7/4/2020 12:24 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Given how I've only developed on FreeBSD so far, anything Windows is
probably at negative infinity :) >
In the new build system, what is the status of automatic symbol
generation, needed for easy debug.
It is badly broken in 4.1.7, with most modules not getting symbols
generated despite --enable-symbols in the configure parameters. This has
cost me weeks of work on a debug project.
On
Dev\openoffice\main\scripting\source\protocolhandler\scripthandler.cxx
does not have symbols.
c:\OpenOfficeDev\openoffice\main\package\source\xstor\xstorage.cxx does
have symbols generated.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 9:13 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In the new build system, what is the sta
On 7/11/2020 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
It’s time to start the process of migrating two of our websites from the
deprecated Apache CMS to a new method of building. This will be a major
undertaking and there are several goals.
The sites are:
https://openoffice.apache.org/
I have given up on getting symbols throughout AOO. The build system
unfortunately ignores --enable-symbols for many, if not most, modules
and partial building and rebuilding are not working for me.
As a workaround, I have a hack for compiling in a break. Visual Studio
has options to take
I am having persistent problems building 4.1.7. The problems also apply
to 4.1.3.
A complete build from clean works, but takes many hours. A build without
cleaning always fails in comphelper.
I have uploaded a typical log file to
http://www.patriciashanahan.com/apache/log3.txt. My configure
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes
>> because of Big
Health permitting I may be able to help with this. I used to help develop,
test, and debug multiprocessor servers so I have spent a lot of time thinking
about concurrency correctness and performance.
Patricia
> On Dec 30, 2020, at 17:02, Steve Lubbs wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 10:30, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
> On Jan 26, 2021, at 07:23, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Hello Arrigo,
>
>> On 24.01.21 15:46, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:40:47AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> There is feedback from Jon Ha ojn Issues that are important from the support
>>> Forum perspective.
That should be documented in “How to Cook a Release”
Patricia
> On Mar 28, 2021, at 09:36, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 28.03.21 um 17:39 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> On 3/28/21 11:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>> Am 28.03.21 um 16:14 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I'm wondering if we should create a branch we can
601 - 630 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
