Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-30 Thread Carl Marcum
Infra is okay with us using 'org.openoffice' as the groupId so that is what I've requested. Carl On 11/29/2015 07:39 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Pedro, comment below. On 11/29/2015 12:54 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: (Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache

RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 11:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository > > Thanks Dennis, > > The

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Carl Marcum
Thanks Dennis, The only remaining issue I think is the preference to use groupId 'org.openoffice' . I am waiting on an answer to if that is a problem with Nexus in the Infra issue I opened and will report back then. As far as I can tell all other projects have an 'org.apache.xxx' groupId.

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Carl Marcum
Comment on URL below. On 11/28/2015 04:45 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Dennis, My comment below. On 11/28/2015 06:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Interesting. Only one comment. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 13:45 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE]

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Pedro, comment below. On 11/29/2015 12:54 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: (Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache address) Hello; First of all huge thanks to Marcus for taking over this project. I would prefer we maintain the org.openoffice groupId. This has

RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-29 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
The wiki compilation on UNO is a work in progress. It has not been touched in any important way since 2009. The wiki link does provide more linked information; it is valuable in that respect. I agree that [1] is a better intended place. It is not clear whether there remains information

RE: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-28 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Interesting. Only one comment. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 13:45 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of > Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-28 Thread Carl Marcum
Here is an updated POM based in previous comments. http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd;> 4.0.0 org.apache.openoffice.udk ridl 4.1.2

Re: [DISCUSS] [UPDATE] Example of POM file for Submission of Java UNO jars to Apache Nexus repository

2015-11-28 Thread Pedro Giffuni
(Sorry if you get this twice, I forgot to send the original from my apache address) Hello; First of all huge thanks to Marcus for taking over this project. I would prefer we maintain the org.openoffice groupId. This has been documented [1] already so we avoid confusion to our developers.