Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-10-09 Thread John D'Orazio
Just wondering what would be considered the fix for this, someone mentioned implementing more logic in the Netbeans plugin. Would a plausible solution be to have Netbeans generate each add-in as a singleton? Or is there maybe a better fix from the open office end in the way it implements the java

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-10-02 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 01/10/14 12:19, Carl Marcum wrote: On 10/01/2014 02:25 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 01/10/14 02:19, Carl Marcum wrote: Amenel, I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: On 09/30/2014 09:39 AM, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote: Hi Carl, I don't know whether it was

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-10-02 Thread John D'Orazio
Does this mean it's a bug in the way open office is implementing the java add-ins generated by the NetBeans plugin? (I'm the one that opened the issue about this in the forum, seeing I'm trying to create a Writer add-in using the NetBeans plugin.) don John R. D'Orazio cappellano coordinatore

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-10-01 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 01/10/14 02:19, Carl Marcum wrote: Amenel, I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: On 09/30/2014 09:39 AM, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote: Hi Carl, I don't know whether it was intended behavior or not. I have ran into this problem in an extension that I started

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-10-01 Thread Carl Marcum
On 10/01/2014 02:25 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 01/10/14 02:19, Carl Marcum wrote: Amenel, I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: On 09/30/2014 09:39 AM, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote: Hi Carl, I don't know whether it was intended behavior or not. I have ran into

Re: [EXTENSIONS] how is the extension constructor called

2014-09-30 Thread Carl Marcum
Amenel, I am cross posting to dev since the original message didn't get copied: On 09/30/2014 09:39 AM, Amenel VOGLOZIN wrote: Hi Carl, I don't know whether it was intended behavior or not. I have ran into this problem in an extension that I started writing in May or June and it was an issue