Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-12-19 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Just as a note, OOo allows the user to select their own JVM and other things such as classpath, and such on the Tools - Options - Java. Could something like this be enabled for Python3 or 2 or would it be as hard as porting the bridge? On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Pedro Giffuni

Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-12-19 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Alexandro; - Messaggio originale - Da: Alexandro Colorado  ... Just as a note, OOo allows the user to select their own JVM and other things such as classpath, and such on the Tools - Options - Java. Could something like this be enabled for Python3 or 2 or would it be as hard

Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-12-02 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Thank you Tsutomu-san! I am currently busy with other stuff but I am aware of what's needed in our pyuno layer so I will examine your code soon. Pedro. - Original Message - From: Tsutomu Uchino Hi, 2012/12/2, Pedro Giffuni : FWIW; After updating Python to 2.7.3 I started

[QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-11-30 Thread FR web forum
Hello list, See: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121284 Is it possible to upgrade Python for MacOS and same version than Windows? Thanks

Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-11-30 Thread FR web forum
In trunk we currently have version 2.7.3. Would that be OK? Python 2.7.3 is in end of life. It will be better to directly include Python 3.3. Compatibility for extensions will be more easy with future LibO 4 that use already this version.

Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-11-30 Thread Alexandro Colorado
There was a discussion about updating the python bridge, I am not sure what was done in the end, or if there was a showstopper. On 11/30/12, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: On 30.11.2012 12:02, FR web forum wrote: In trunk we currently have version 2.7.3. Would that be OK? Python 2.7.3

Re: [QA] Python version late for MacOS

2012-11-30 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: On 30.11.2012 12:02, FR web forum wrote: In trunk we currently have version 2.7.3. Would that be OK? Python 2.7.3 is in end of life. It will be better to directly include Python 3.3. Compatibility for extensions will