On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:59 +0100, Rüdiger Timm wrote: > > Mathias Bauer wrote: > > Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: > > > > > >>>Here I disagree. The version shound contain only the regular version > >>>number, but why not showing the build version directly in the "About > >>>dialog" below the version (instead of asking for "CTRL-SDT to display it")? > >>> > >> > >>Yes, please let's do this. And it should be the whole string including > >>mws, milestone and buildid. > > > > > > So you mean exactly the same string as we currently show in the credits > > dialog? > > > > No, that one is incomplete. It only contains the workspace number (UPD), > not it's full name, f.e. "680m150(Build8995)". Or do I confuse things here? > We should IMHO show the full version > OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 > and build information > SRC680 m150 (Build8995) >
+1 I am finding that our newest users cannot find Ctrl-SDT and it confuses them when asked what release they have. Better to improve Help > About so that it, at the least, shows some more complete version info. Better would be to include minor release numbers on the splash screen as well. On more thing I have noticed on this topic. The information in *NIX bootstraprc is more complete than that included in windows bootstraprc.ini. Would be nice if these were the same. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
