Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-23 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Niklas, On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 10:40 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote: Michael Meeks wrote: Let me show you why I feel this way, from a simple example I was reading this morning: notice the consultation going on in this issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56202 Had

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-22 Thread Mathias Bauer
Uwe Fischer wrote: Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote: So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the less likely any decision is to be taken: consider the difficulty of choosing a restaurant with 3 people vs. 10 people. I don't like Chinese, I can't walk far, I

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-20 Thread Uwe Fischer
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote: So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the less likely any decision is to be taken: consider the difficulty of choosing a restaurant with 3 people vs. 10 people. I don't like Chinese, I can't walk far, I know this place ...

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-20 Thread Andrew Young
David Wilson wrote: Perhaps if at the bottom of every help page there was a email link with Please contact us about any any problems or suggestions with this help topic. We want to make perfect.) You would get more comments. (Using the link should add the topic name and language and help

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Frank, On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:35 +0200, Frank Schönheit wrote: In this case, Uwe would have told you that various documentation would need to be updated, to keep the product consistent So - my experience is that the more people involved in a decision - the less likely any decision

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-19 Thread David Wilson
On Friday 20 October 2006 7:14 am, Michael Meeks wrote:  As I say, of the ~million or so users that have been exposed to the outdated help in this area, none I know of have noticed or cared enough to actually file a bug. In general people are amazed when they find a help system actually

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-18 Thread Mathias Bauer
Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Uwe, On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 13:50 +0200, Uwe Fischer wrote: Don't get me wrong - I love this feature and I will never say anything negative about Michael Meeks, who surely is a programming genius. ;-) Haha ;-) the sarcasm detector just exploded. I don't

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-18 Thread Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germa ny
Hi Rüdiger, while you made some valid points, this one does not hold: 1) Timing of integration is not under control of CWS owner. Program Management is responsible here. 2) Integrating the CWS on 2006-10-06 is in time. UI freeze of 2006-10-05 means that your CWS has to be approved by QA at

Re: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-17 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Uwe, On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 13:50 +0200, Uwe Fischer wrote: Don't get me wrong - I love this feature and I will never say anything negative about Michael Meeks, who surely is a programming genius. ;-) Haha ;-) the sarcasm detector just exploded. How am I supposed to deliver a

RE: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails

2006-10-11 Thread Kirill S. Palagin
) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails Hi, today I installed build m187 on Solaris, and a new feature surprised me. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[dev] m187 (was: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails)

2006-10-11 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kirill, On Wednesday, 2006-10-11 16:19:33 +0400, Kirill S. Palagin wrote: (Sorry for hijacking the thread) You're lucky you weren't successfully achieving that because your mailer-non-tool doesn't generate neither References nor In-Reply-To headers ;-) Anyway.. Is m187 available outside

RE: [dev] m187 (was: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails)

2006-10-11 Thread Kirill S. Palagin
OK, thanks! -Original Message- From: Eike Rathke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:09 PM To: dev@openoffice.org Subject: [dev] m187 (was: [dev] A word about (missing) Specification Documents and (late) Feature Mails) Hi Kirill, On Wednesday, 2006