[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name unoinfo* /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo in Debian, is that what you mean? Good that this script isn't documented

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread rony
Hi René, On 07.06.2011 09:56, Rene Engelhard wrote: ... cut ... rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name unoinfo* /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo in Debian, is that what you mean? If yes, then it's interesting why Ubuntu

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote: unoinfo java and interestingly unoil.jar is missing! Did a locate unoil.jar after an updatedb, but it is not installed. So this is Obviously totally untrue. I don't think Ubuntu removed unoil.jar, that would break everything Java-ish. Did

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-07 Thread Christian Lippka
Am 06.06.2011 17:27, schrieb Michael Stahl: On 06.06.11 16:35, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: Has anyone tried refactoring OUString? - It converts iso-8859-1 letters ranging 0x00-0x7f into UCS2 even it is not necessary. - It requires malloc(), realloc(), and free() or their

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200 rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote: [... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...] And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not supply a link to the place for reporting it? If it was easy to find such a place, I would have reported it

[dev] HELP REQUIRED

2011-06-07 Thread Shashank Sharma
hello, I am a undergraduate student of third year (INDIAN INSTITTE OF TECHNOLOGY-IIT) and wants to develop new functionality in open office.before trying on the features of to do list , i want to add small functionality.However i am not clear how to start and how to proceed further.Also i started

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread rony
Hi Bjoern, just saw your e-mail appear now in the list, hence the late answer. Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :( Regards,

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, rony wrote: This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla installation, after having gone further: * Ubuntu 11.04 does *not* install any of the Java classes in /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program/classes,

[dev] Re: HELP REQUIRED

2011-06-07 Thread Shameera Rathnayaka
hi shashanka sharma first try with the examples in the developer guide to perform some basic things something like add a string to the writer doc if you are willing to work with writer. With that try to familiar with the java api. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Shashank Sharma

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote: Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :( There IS NOTHING CRIPPELD. Just

[dev] Re: HELP REQUIRED

2011-06-07 Thread lakmal padmakumara
Hi there , Developers guide was the best resource I had when I was in the same situation like you ! Anyway I have written a small blog post about how to get started on plugin developement based on my experience. link:http://srilankatechnology.blogspot.com/2010_11_01_archive.html This contains a

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:28:18 +0200 rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote: This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla installation Which does not include a full libreoffice installation, as this is unfortunately impossible to fit on the install CD along with the rest of the

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-07 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On 06.06.2011 19:43, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: And also, please cover the underlying memory allocation mechanism which would be another key factor for the performance improvement. On 2011/06/07 3:04, Niklas Nebel wrote: There's an old suggestion to treat small strings differently, see

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread rony
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote: Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:52:41PM +0200, rony wrote: If packages deviate from the reference packages (OOo or LO), they get crippled, like it or not. Nonsense. They just ha a bit other structure, the functionality is supposed to be there. Just install the one package you miss.

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread rony
Hi René, On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote: Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. You cripple XYZ. When we don't. (And you say we do that intentionally, which is also a insult) O.K., I take this one

[dev] Re: HELP REQUIRED

2011-06-07 Thread tora - Takamichi Akiyama
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Shashank Sharma shashan...@iitrpr.ac.in mailto:shashan...@iitrpr.ac.in wrote: hello, I am a undergraduate student of third year (INDIAN INSTITTE OF TECHNOLOGY-IIT) and wants to develop new functionality in open office.before trying on the features of

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:28:53PM +0200, rony wrote: On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote: Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. You cripple XYZ. When we don't. (And you say we do that

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-07 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 07.06.2011 13:15, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: As many already know, malloc() is too general and too expensive. Moreover, free() is much more expensive than malloc(). e.g. a source code of malloc() in glibc: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=malloc/malloc.c We use our own

[dev] Re: refactoring OUString

2011-06-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 07.06.2011 17:22, Niklas Nebel wrote: On 07.06.2011 13:15, tora - Takamichi Akiyama wrote: As many already know, malloc() is too general and too expensive. Moreover, free() is much more expensive than malloc(). e.g. a source code of malloc() in glibc: