Aditya Pandey wrote:
Hi Jayant
Thanks for replying. I have compiled my addon's files with -g option. I
dont think it even gets a chance to be considered by gdb (I uninstalled my
addon and then tried gdb-attaching to openoffice, it didnt like the idea :)
).
Yes, I am not using a debug
Mathias Bauer pe v t 10. 05. 2005 v 19:04 +0200:
You should be more clear: do they get opened readonly *always*?
If yes: it could be a problem in OOo.
If no (means: only sometimes): I'm a little bit clueless.
I was writing similiar macro in the Basic (m97, m100, ...) and have no
problems at
dandaman32,
I am interested, Please give me some screenshots and a sample program.
thks a lt!
=== 2005-05-11 05:12:17 ===
To whom it may concern:
Hi, my name is Dan Fuhry. I am a Windows XP user and I am an expert in
the field of installation and maintenance. After
Do you already try this or you still think this as an Idea ?
Because the installer of Ooo is different with other
Please look at http://installation.openoffice.org/
How to deal with current installer ?
And how about the license of the script ?
Best Regards,
Utomo
-Original Message-
Hi,
normally you would define a new service which includes the
SimpleRegistry service and extend your new stuff. The implementation can
maybe reused and only the new stuff have to be implemented. But it
depends on the new features. But take into account that you can't change
the interface. You
I have been trying to explore howto make UI/Dialogs for my OpenOffice Writer
addon.
Since the addon has external dependencies and other factors, I need to program
addon in C++.
But, if I follow the approach mentioned in Sergey Montou's book on OpenOffice
Programming in C++, I have to program
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 11:10 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi Jorge,
this is a bug and it is interesting that nobody until now have detected
this bug. Please submit an issue to me.
A workaround would be to install the SDK in a path without spaces.
Paths with spaces issue is documented in the
Recoding OOo into C# seems like a lot of work, and I'm not sure what the
point of it would be. Running it under Mono? Mono is not exactly known
for speed. I don't think it's ready to handle something like OOo.
I think it makes more sense for someone (you?) to make a Mono-UNO bridge
so people
Sophie Gautier wrote:
As I havn't seen this link pointed yet here, may be you'll be interested
in this initiative called Apache Harmony
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200505.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a bit more:
Daniel Carrera pe v St 11. 05. 2005 v 07:57 -0400:
I think it makes more sense for someone (you?) to make a Mono-UNO bridge
so people can write extensions in C#.
Look at http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/patches/mono/
--
Robert Vojta
http://blog.vojta.name/
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 07:57 -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
I think it makes more sense for someone (you?) to make a Mono-UNO bridge
so people can write extensions in C#.
A good chunk of that work is already done lurking in ooo-build
getting finished slowly.
Hmm,
Anton,
Why are you so sure your installer is as powerful as OO.org is?
The NSIS installer is well known, and it is definitely open source, and
quite superior to MSI. In addition to everything Dan listed, I'd like to
add that NSIS includes superior compression (LZMA - of 7-zip fame).
Is it
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
Hi,
I thought people might be interested in this link. It seems the RMS
wants to fork OpenOffice.org due to its reliance on JDK.
Thoughts,
Kevin
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
From: Bruce Byfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 8,
13 matches
Mail list logo
