On 09/09/2009 17:43, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
It looks like the cursor moves with the same ammount of positions as
bytes encoding the UTF-8 character.
I wouldn't be surprised at all. I'm a little loth to spend time on
fine-tuning something, with the risk of introducing more bugs, that
Adobe
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Claudius Henrichs claudius.h at gmx.de
wrote:
I've set up a wiki page [1] with some impressive routing results on OSM
data compared to Google. For example we can already route from Teheran,
Iran to Lisbon, Portugal and to New Delhi, India. Or you can hail a
Hi all,
During the imports support group conference call, the question of import tools
was raised.
I can't quite recall everyone's point of view, but I think that the general
idea was the more tools, the better.
I'm all for an unix-like approach: lots of small specialised tools, that work
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
You can see where this goes. If the input polygons are non-overlapping and
adjacent, I could redraw the edges of the polygons as graph edges, put a
graph node whenever three (or more) polygons touch each other, and then apply
some graph theory to convert
2009/9/14 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
You can see where this goes. If the input polygons are non-overlapping and
adjacent, I could redraw the edges of the polygons as graph edges, put a
graph node whenever three (or more) polygons touch each other, and then
apply
some graph
does anybody know an JAVA-Library with similar features like OpenLayers
Javascript-Lib?
I would like to enhance our Java-Client to get maps from WMS-Servers.
Thanks for your effort.
I don't know if it fills your needs but take a look to this software:
http://www.geomajas.org/
Bye,
Stefano
El Lunes, 14 de Septiembre de 2009, Ian Dees escribió:
This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
multipolygon relation? Maybe I'm
Ian,
This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
multipolygon relation? Maybe I'm not correctly interpreting what you meant.
Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk writes:
On 13 Sep 2009, at 10:56, Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
In OSM a relation can contain other relations but it seems that there
is nothing to check that a relation doesn't contain itself. I can't
think of any legitimate reason that it should be
El Lunes, 14 de Septiembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
[...] The goal is to split up the polygons into their border lines, and then
create OSM multipolygon relations where the border consists of several of
those lines, and every line is used by two adjacent polygons [...]
*AT LEAST* two
2009/9/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Ian,
This feature could be added, but could you draw a couple pictures to
explain what you mean? What happens with the graph edges inside the
multipolygon? Since they aren't really polygons, do they belong in a
multipolygon relation? Maybe I'm
+1
This has needed a tidyup for a long time.
I'm done with this change.
I have renamed every relevant page to API v0.x and API changes
between v0.x and v0.y and I tried to correct every link to point to
the new name. I might have missed some references but...it should
work, because the old
Hi Guys,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
P.S.: Remind me to take a course in computational geometry. I'm feeling like
I
need it.
I figure this is as good of a time as any to plug CGAL...it's a hard
core open source comp-geom lib:
http://www.cgal.org/
in my work with OSM (exporting all roads
On 14 Sep 2009, at 19:26, Lars Francke wrote:
+1
This has needed a tidyup for a long time.
I'm done with this change.
I have renamed every relevant page to API v0.x and API changes
between v0.x and v0.y and I tried to correct every link to point to
the new name. I might have missed some
Is the old page redirecting to the new page?
All old pages should redirect to their new versions, yes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.3
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.4
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.5
Hi,
Ben Supnik wrote:
I figure this is as good of a time as any to plug CGAL...it's a hard
core open source comp-geom lib:
Great piece of software, but it is worth noting that CGAL has a license
issue. Parts of it are LGPL (which is ok) but some of the more
interesting bits are under a
Hi Frederik,
QPL is GPL incompatible? Doh! I was unaware of this...I was aware that
CGAL is at least contagiously copy-left...not something I terribly like.
My thought though is that for a stand-alone tool this is not necessarily
a deal-breaker.
cheers
ben
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Ben
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I made a MOTD which uses HTML table syntax:
http://u.nix.is/~avar/motd.html
I think it uses up space a bit better than the current one. But
unfortunately trac deosn't support HTML tables (they end up being
escaped).
There are also some
Ulf Lamping wrote:
That made me think if it might be possible to install JAVA and JOSM on
an USB stick and run JOSM on any suitable Windows machine without any
further installation on the target machine.
It seems to be possible!
It is, I had this working last year. I followed the guide
Lennard schrieb:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
That made me think if it might be possible to install JAVA and JOSM on
an USB stick and run JOSM on any suitable Windows machine without any
further installation on the target machine.
It seems to be possible!
It is, I had this working last year. I
MOTD says:
JOSM now supports keeping multiple changesets open simultaneously on
the server. If you want to change something you notice while making an
unrelated change you can now tag that change correctly.
Could whoever wrote that please re-write it so that normal users can
understand it?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
MOTD says:
JOSM now supports keeping multiple changesets open simultaneously on
the server. If you want to change something you notice while making an
unrelated change you can now tag that change correctly.
Could
22 matches
Mail list logo
