Hi,
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Inasmuch as the underlying concepts are identical (more or less), I
don't like the idea that we can use different key name or values to
represent those concepts.
Thing is, the underlying concepts will very often be more or less
identical but never really.
At
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:25:29 +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt
track.
When you select dirt track potlach adds highway=track and surface=dirt
tags. That wouldn't be an issue if the icon beside it wouldn't be man
walking. There
2009/10/1 SteveC st...@asklater.com
I think it is an interesting idea. It would make some people happy about tag
proliferation and gradually it has the possibility of fixing things up. The
debate on orchard, plantage, farmland could be partially be solved by this
mechanism, while allowing
valentt wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt track.
When you select dirt track potlach adds highway=track and
surface=dirt tags. That wouldn't be an issue if the icon beside it
wouldn't be man walking. There should be a car icon instead of
man walking
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:25 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences. It might be
solving a problem that doesn't exist or someone might have done it and
I've missed it.
Closest I got was the osmosis tagtransform plugin [1].
I made that because
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:25 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences. It might be
solving a problem that doesn't exist or someone might have done it and
I've missed it.
We have already, it's been made and engineered and everything. Don't
mistake
SteveC wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences. It might be
solving a problem that doesn't exist or someone might have done
it and I've missed it.
Wow, lots of issues here. And since
I'm not a socialist moral relativist
...I am, almost, then I get a head-start on this
Dave Stubbs wrote:
One of the big questions is whether all of this would make life
easier or harder for the renderers -- it would definitely raise the
tech start bar.
Standard libraries ftw.
People's unwillingness to do any form of pre-processing on an increasingly
varied OSM dataset never
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
One of the big questions is whether all of this would make life
easier or harder for the renderers -- it would definitely raise the
tech start bar.
Standard libraries ftw.
People's
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
Andy Allan wrote:
We have already, it's been made and engineered and everything. Don't
mistake endless unproductive waffle on the mailing lists as evidence
that a problem hasn't been solved - it's just
2009/10/1 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
On 01/10/2009 03:25, SteveC wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences.
I would like to go further than Steve proposes, but I understand it is a
hard sell to the anarchist wing of OSM while being welcome to the
conformist wing.
On 01/10/2009 12:54, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/1 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
On 01/10/2009 03:25, SteveC wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences.
I would like to go further than Steve proposes, but I understand it is a
hard sell to the anarchist wing of OSM
2009/10/1 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
Keeping multiple, probably different, descriptions and translations across
all the programs that use OSM is the thing that seems crazy to me.
Sorry, misunderstood what you were suggesting, I agree 100%
I've done something similar in the past
El Jueves, 1 de Octubre de 2009, SteveC escribió:
Thoughts?
Likenesses -1; implications +1.
e.g.:
highway=autobahn implies highway=motorway
highway=motorway implies oneway=yes
highway=motorway implies highway=road
Basically it's just the same idea, but by using the word imply, it suddenly
2009/10/1 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
That argument is bogus.
It's much easier to do the translations on a couple of servers rather
than make the 100,000's editors more complicated so that they use more
laptop battery and make all the mappers have to go home early.
Well JOSM is
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:33 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/1 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
That argument is bogus.
It's much easier to do the translations on a couple of servers rather
than make the 100,000's editors more complicated so that they use more
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
I've now fixed Potlatch up so that it can be Translated on
Translatewiki. Now it just needs to be imported into Translatewiki.
I've put up a notice on the OSM wiki so that confused Translators
won't use it in
2009/10/1 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
valentt wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt track.
When you select dirt track potlach adds highway=track and
surface=dirt tags. That wouldn't be an issue if the icon beside it
wouldn't be man walking.
2009/10/1 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:33 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/1 Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk:
That argument is bogus.
It's much easier to do the translations on a couple of servers rather
than make the 100,000's
We are a group of students from Delhi Technological University and
Head,Open Source Society in the college .We wish to work on OSM as a project
with an active participation.Please may you guide us for the same.
Regards,
Nipun Batra
Open Source Society
Delhi Technological University
India
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 06:20, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 01/10/2009 03:25, SteveC wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences.
I would like to go further than Steve proposes, but I understand it is a
hard sell to the anarchist wing of OSM while being
2009/10/2 David Lynch djly...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 06:20, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 01/10/2009 03:25, SteveC wrote:
I want to revive a very old idea - tag equivalences.
I would like to go further than Steve proposes, but I understand it is a
hard sell to
Hi there,
Well do you mean as coders or as editors?
First you should start by reviewing the maps of the places you know.
Look up your home town and check if it is ok.
If you see something missing, use the editor or josm.openstreetmap.de
for fixing it.
mike
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Sent: 01 October 2009 2:11 PM
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] potlach has wrong preset
2009/10/1 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
valentt wrote:
Hi, I have noticed that Potlach assigns wrong tags for dirt dirt
track.
Hi there,
in applications/rendering/gosmore
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/browser/applications/rendering/gosmore?rev=17737
[17734:17737]
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/log/applications/rendering/gosmore?rev=17737stop_rev=17734
the public domain disclaimer, which used to be the first line in
Hi,
gosmore fails to rebuild a pak file since the introduction of FWRITE
macro definition. Reason:
fwrite(buf, elemsize, numelems, pak) returns the number of elems written.
fwrite (idx, fsize, 1, pak) will fail, if there is an empty file, in
this case fsize is 0. fwrite is told to write 1
On 01/10/09 20:34, Christian Müller wrote:
gosmore fails to rebuild a pak file since the introduction of FWRITE
macro definition. Reason:
Can you not send these messages to the developer of gosmore rather than
spamming the dev list with them?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
Hi all - I tried to do a rough analysis (for an article I'm writing) of the
composition of an API response by character count. If anyone knows more
about this or has opinions or ideas for better (but lightweight) means of
quantifying this, i'd love to hear them.
I’ve been wondering how much of
Can you not reply with strong words like 'spamming' on messages like these?
It sounds so much nicer to point good intending people to the Trac website
[1] and have them create tickets and attach the patches there...
[1] http://trac.openstreetmap.org (choose component 'gosmore' when
submitting
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:49:43 +0200, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
A token gets gets generated on the database server (or transmitted to
it) and it gets transmitted to the user via HTTPS.
The token will encode the password on the user's side and transmit it in
plaintext to the server. The server
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:18:17 +0200, Stefan Baebler wrote:
There are open tickets about ssl and encrypting passwords:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/275
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/106
I see these are 4 years old tickets :(
How far is it from realization so that we start using
Hi,
Valent Turkovic wrote:
A token gets gets generated on the database server (or transmitted to
it) and it gets transmitted to the user via HTTPS.
The token will encode the password on the user's side and transmit it in
plaintext to the server. The server will encode it using the token.
Hi there,
sorry, I can't find the original thread about the problem
that JOSM transfers passwords unprotected to the server...
Perhaps my understanding of security is mistaken, but this is
the way, how *I* would do it:
1. Set up two small servers (Atom) in the same network as the
database
33 matches
Mail list logo
