Re: [osmosis-dev] Cryptic error message

2010-04-24 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, org.openstreetmap.osmosis.core.OsmosisRuntimeException: Task 2-bounding-box does not support data provided by default pipe stored at level 1 in the default pipe stack. You must either upgrade your data to 0.6 by adding a --migrate after the --read-xml-0.5, or you must use the 0.5

Re: [osmosis-dev] Cryptic error message

2010-04-24 Thread Nakor
On 04/24/2010 01:54 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, org.openstreetmap.osmosis.core.OsmosisRuntimeException: Task 2-bounding-box does not support data provided by default pipe stored at level 1 in the default pipe stack. You must either upgrade your data to 0.6 by adding a --migrate after the

Re: [OSM-dev] Error in Makefile for osm2pgsql on OSX

2010-04-24 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 24 Apr 2010, at 06:27, Simon Gornall wrote: At least on my system (10.6.3) I had to add: CPPFLAGS = $(CFLAGS) ... to get the Makefile to build build_geometry.cpp - otherwise there were no CFLAGS set, and the build failed. It might be worth mentioning on the wiki that you

Re: [OSM-dev] [josm-dev] Git mirror of JOSM on GitHub

2010-04-24 Thread jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:16 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: Thats great, I will test build it. I have been dreaming last night about compiling josm with the GNU Java Compiler: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ dream come true

[OSM-dev] generate OSM tiles in a different projection using Mapnik

2010-04-24 Thread Scott Pezanowski
Hi, I am trying to generate OSM tiles in a different projection from the Google Projection using Mapnik. I am using the generate_tiles.py mapnik script from the svn repository and it is working great for the Google Projection. I am a bit of a novice with python and mapnik and am now trying to

[josm-dev] New unstable phase opened

2010-04-24 Thread Dirk Stöcker
Hello, If no bigger problems are reported till friday, then new development cycle may start at friday and we move to Java6. Actually we have a critical bug: #4929 - filtered objects are selectable. This should be fixed soon. I increased tested to 3201. The main development cycle is

Re: [josm-dev] Saving WMS in JOSM

2010-04-24 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Alan Mintz wrote: (Note Cc to josm-dev. Is this the right thing to do? I looked for an open ticket first and didn't find one.) The right thing is opening a ticket. Reports and this list tend to be forgotten. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

Re: [josm-dev] Git mirror of JOSM on GitHub

2010-04-24 Thread jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:16 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: Thats great, I will test build it. I have been dreaming last night about compiling josm with the GNU Java Compiler: http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ dream come true

Re: [josm-dev] Git mirror of JOSM on GitHub

2010-04-24 Thread jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
I will next encapsulate/isolate the changes, yes. I am also more interested in optimizing the generated code, will work on some optimizations first. mike On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:51, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com

Re: [josm-dev] New unstable phase opened

2010-04-24 Thread Sebastian Klein
Hi, We still have this one open: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4861 Today there was another report of basically the same problem http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4942 For me it happened frequently on upload of large data sets (with active filters). This can be a little disturbing

Re: [josm-dev] josm and gcj (was: Git mirror of JOSM on GitHub)

2010-04-24 Thread jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
opening a file works for me, send me your file. I have a feeling that the open file dialog is noticibley faster, what about you? thanks mike On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote: jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: I will next encapsulate/isolate the

Re: [josm-dev] New unstable phase opened

2010-04-24 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2010-04-24 04:28, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dirk_St=F6cker?= wrote: I increased tested to 3201. The start page in JOSM still says You are using version '3196' of JOSM. The current stable snapshot is 3196 and 3201 is the unstable development version. Is this expected? -- Alan Mintz