can you recommend any GPS hardware receiver (no maps, no nothing, just
GPS) to use with notebook?
I own a Xaiox Xplorer, a Wintec WBT 201 and a i-Blue 747. From all three I like
the i-Blue most. The used MTK chip is quite resistant against reflections. The
NMEA protocoll has all information
The shipped software is kind of sparse and mediocre.
That's an understatement!
Yesterday I was slashed down for phrasing such things more precisely and
accurate. Today I choose the political correct mumbo jumbo ;) Don't want to
hurt anyone's feelings again...
Usually you just need it
Richard,
Oh right, and saying Because Garmin users are brain washed and And
they won't stop to cheerleader for Garmin until the day they drop
dead is utterly, utterly rational and adult. And the shit recorded
by Garmin is a technical description and not an emotive insult at all.
you
On Monday, 22. September 2008 17:42:42 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Oliver Eichler wrote:
you definetly missed to cite the last line of the original posting
SCNR trolling ;)
Hey, if I'm being slated for daring to take the piss, you can be too. ;)
LOL ok :)
Oliver
On Sunday, 21. September 2008 13:41:58 David Earl wrote:
On 20/09/2008 22:08, Stefan de Konink wrote:
I sincerely wonder why anyone in the community would buy a Garmin as
tracking device after (s)he is aware that the device doesn't report
h-/v-/p-dop. This is even more basic
OK, I understand now. But I still don't know what I'd do with the
information if I had it. The satellites are where they are when I'm out
surveying, there's nothing I can do about the positional accuracy. It's
usually pretty obvious when a track has gone wildly off (usually due to
woodland
Good idea :)
I am always tempted to do my own binary vector map format after suffering the
madness by Garmin. However the wonderfull world of raster maps keeps me from
doing it.
Anyway, I would suggest you have a deep look into the Garmin binary
sepcification. Some things are good, some are
7 matches
Mail list logo
