Re: [PATCH] Version for Apache2.pm

2003-01-01 Thread Leon Brocard
Doug MacEachern sent the following bits through the ether: > Apache2.pm is generated, no problem to add a $VERSION. i don't think it > should be the same as $mod_perl::VERSION, or do you need it to be? No, as long as it has a version anything is fine ;-) Leon -- Leon Brocard..

Re: [PATCH] Version for Apache2.pm

2002-12-31 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > Apache2.pm is generated doh, nevermind this comment. it used to be generated, but not anymore. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: [PATCH] Version for Apache2.pm

2002-12-31 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Leon Brocard wrote: > Apache2.pm doesn't have a version number, so I worked around it: > http://search.cpan.org/src/LBROCARD/OpenFrame-Segment-Apache2-1.00/Makefile.PL > > But to be honest, I don't see why it doesn't. Here's a trivial patch > to open up discusssion ;-) Apach

[PATCH] Version for Apache2.pm

2002-12-31 Thread Leon Brocard
Apache2.pm doesn't have a version number, so I worked around it: http://search.cpan.org/src/LBROCARD/OpenFrame-Segment-Apache2-1.00/Makefile.PL But to be honest, I don't see why it doesn't. Here's a trivial patch to open up discusssion ;-) Leon -- Leon Brocard.http://