On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:09:18AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
Sadly, there doesn't seem to be a good way to figure out of something is a path
in the first place. Don't want to put `pwd` in front of every single argument
that doesn't
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:38:36AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
mpm), but i still have yet to update perl-current.
does perl-current pass all the tests for you Doug?
hard to tell since i am not
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
With the forking MPM everything goes well...
Apparently, something broke with perl_clone ;-(
Guess I'll switch to forked MPM for now.
That's what I've done a few weeks ago, after Doug suggested to do so as
the threaded mpp wasn't stable
Sadly, there doesn't seem to be a good way to figure out of something is a path
in the first place. Don't want to put `pwd` in front of every single argument
that doesn't start with '/'
So, this just attempts to clean MP_APXS.
--
Philippe M. Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Extropia's Resident
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
That's what I've done a few weeks ago, after Doug suggested to do so as
the threaded mpp wasn't stable anymore.
'worker' is probably going to replace 'threaded' and seems pretty stable.
the bug philippe is seeing is clearly a bug in Perl (not the
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
Sadly, there doesn't seem to be a good way to figure out of something is a path
in the first place. Don't want to put `pwd` in front of every single argument
that doesn't start with '/'
So, this just attempts to clean MP_APXS.
thanks. one
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
mpm), but i still have yet to update perl-current.
does perl-current pass all the tests for you Doug?
hard to tell since i am not using perl-current current.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:48:26AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
The following patch makes sure that MP_APXS is an absolute path. If you used
MP_APXS=../deps/httpd/bin/apxs it would make a bunch of things fail ;-)
thanks, could you send
On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 10:29:38PM +0800, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
The following patch makes sure that MP_APXS is an absolute path. If you used
+if($val =~ /^$fs_updir/) {
I suggest using File::Spec-file_name_is_absolute() here, not all
relative paths begin with updir. Or
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
The following patch makes sure that MP_APXS is an absolute path. If you used
MP_APXS=../deps/httpd/bin/apxs it would make a bunch of things fail ;-)
And there was also a very small patch to Apache-Test that didn't include the
right package.
The following patch makes sure that MP_APXS is an absolute path. If you used
MP_APXS=../deps/httpd/bin/apxs it would make a bunch of things fail ;-)
And there was also a very small patch to Apache-Test that didn't include the
right package.
Note: Right now, with latest httpd perl, I get a
11 matches
Mail list logo
