On 16 Jul 2001 17:56:13 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On 16 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
However you still need PerlModule AxKit, to load the .so (actually even
that's slightly incorrect - I have it working so you can do LoadModule
/path/to/AxKit.so).
eek, why would you want to use
On 17 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I don't. It's not documented, it was just an experiment. I wanted to see
if it would work :-)
oh, ok. when you said that's slightly incorrect, i thought you meant
LoadModule should be used instead of PerlModule.
Actually I also wanted to see if it would
On 16 Jul 2001 14:46:45 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi doug...
what's the game plan for directive handlers in 2.0. I was playing around
with them in 1.3 quite heavily last week and found myself wondering if it
wouldn't be cool to have a generic mechanism that you could slip into the
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sergeant
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 7/16/01 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: directive handlers in 2.0
On 16 Jul 2001 14:46:45 -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi doug...
what's the game plan for directive handlers in 2.0. I was playing
On 16 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
However you still need PerlModule AxKit, to load the .so (actually even
that's slightly incorrect - I have it working so you can do LoadModule
/path/to/AxKit.so).
eek, why would you want to use 'LoadModule /path/to/AxKit.so' rather than
'PerlModule
-Original Message-
From: Doug MacEachern
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 7/16/01 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: directive handlers in 2.0
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi doug...
what's the game plan for directive handlers in 2.0. I was playing
around
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
My thought was that, since you are already implementing directive handlers,
register it with the fixup phase when you generate the XS (or whatever, as
you pointed out in the other reply). This way the only change to httpd.conf
is a single
