-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:47 PM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Apache::Test order
[snip]
Also how about specifying the order in the Makefile.PL? I think Brian
Moseley has asked
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Also how about specifying the order in the Makefile.PL? I think Brian
Moseley has asked for the same a few weeks ago and ended up using the
Makefile.PL, see the earlier thread about ordering.
duh, don't know how I forgot about that - 'tis
I've been thinking about implementing a test ordering scheme for Apache
test and wanted to run it by everyone...
basically from
t/foo.t
t/bar.t
I'd like to be able to specify whether foo.t comes before or after bar.t
(without calling them 1foo.t :)
my reasoning is that it
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
what do you think about this para about default sorting?
I understand. Another option would be to always sort the
tests unless you have specified their order on the
command line.
o if you specify none -- everything is sorted.
o if you
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
i'm using Apache-Test as reference for my (greatly
simplified) wombat test harness. i can't figure out how you
ensure that tests are run in a specific order, or even if
you are. certainly you're not in the case where you build a
list of tests using
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
the only way to ensure identical order from run to run,
across different systems (and changes in file inodes
ordering) is to explicitly list the tests in the wanted
order. otherwise it's up to the inodes order under ./t.
Since I mess with tests
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
the only way to ensure identical order from run to run,
across different systems (and changes in file inodes
ordering) is to explicitly list the tests in the wanted
order. otherwise it's up to the inodes
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
ok will add 'sort'. which will presort tests before
applying any other algorithm.
should 'sort' be non-exclusive with 'rotate|repeat'? (it
won't apply to 'random' of course)
but it gets hairy then: --run-tests[=[N][:][order][:][sort]] ?
I'd rather
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
ok will add 'sort'. which will presort tests before
applying any other algorithm.
should 'sort' be non-exclusive with 'rotate|repeat'? (it
won't apply to 'random' of course)
but it gets hairy then:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I understand. Another option would be to always sort the
tests unless you have specified their order on the
command line.
o if you specify none -- everything is sorted.
o if you specify only dirs -- evething within dirs is sorted, dirs order
is
10 matches
Mail list logo
