Re: MP_APXS vs MP_AP_PREFIX

2003-10-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
optional both at mod_perl build time and an 3rd party module build time? I'd like to think that we can make this work so that mod_perl does the right thing - if mod_perl was built with the md5 versioning, then WriteMakefile does the right thing (or as close as we can get). You forget that you

Re: MP_APXS vs MP_AP_PREFIX

2003-10-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] ok. but remember it's not just 2.0 versus 2.1 - it can also be 2.0 with multiple mpms. granted, using a different mpm isn't likely to cause compilation errors later on... hmm. if mpms won't cause compile problems, I wonder if just specifying the apache version is

Re: MP_APXS vs MP_AP_PREFIX

2003-10-29 Thread Geoffrey Young
The only missing thing to make the picture complete is PERL5LIB, which bites us back, so we need to instrument Apache-Test to be able to set PerlSwitches -I for us (or use lib for mp1). how about this? PerlSwitches [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ might not want to die for unrecognized variables anymore, th

Re: MP_APXS vs MP_AP_PREFIX

2003-10-29 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: The only missing thing to make the picture complete is PERL5LIB, which bites us back, so we need to instrument Apache-Test to be able to set PerlSwitches -I for us (or use lib for mp1). how about this? PerlSwitches [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ might not want to die for unrecogniz