Re: Status of "Oxia" in Apache ecosystem?

2024-01-22 Thread Matteo Merli
Hi Dave, (I just saw this thread, though I have already replied in a DM on LinkedIn to Paul). I don't know exactly what was in the ASF talk submitted abstract that generated the confusion. To clarify even more confusion: * Oxia *is* a public OSS project licensed with Apache License v2 * Oxia

Re: Status of "Oxia" in Apache ecosystem?

2024-01-22 Thread 太上玄元道君
Oxia is a project of StreamNative inc, it's non public. From my understanding, it's a zookeeper proxy, like Apache ShardingSphere, for the purpose of zookeeper's horizontal expansion. Dave Fisher 于2024年1月23日 周二05:23写道: > Hi Paul, > > There is no such thing as Apache Oxia. It is from a vendor in

Re: Status of "Oxia" in Apache ecosystem?

2024-01-22 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Paul, There is no such thing as Apache Oxia. It is from a vendor in the Pulsar ecosystem - StreamNative. It is meant to plug into Pulsar and I think but am not sure that it is a replacement for Apache Zookeeper, but … Best, Dave > On Jan 22, 2024, at 12:57 AM, Brebner, Paul > wrote: > >

Status of "Oxia" in Apache ecosystem?

2024-01-22 Thread Brebner, Paul
Hi Pulsar people, I’m track chair for a Community over Code EU track 2024, we’ve had a submission that mentions “Apache Oxia” and I’d like to check this accuracy of this and potential clarifications. I.e. I assume it’s not a top level Apache project, but maybe it’s part of Pulsar? In which

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar Year in Review blog post

2024-01-22 Thread Julien Jakubowski
Thank you! I added your suggestion. I'd love the community to add more input. Otherwise, let's merge the PR tomorrow morning. On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:14 PM Lari Hotari wrote: > I added a comment about "What’s next in 2024". It would be great to > have more concrete and interesting things

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar Year in Review blog post

2024-01-22 Thread Lari Hotari
I added a comment about "What’s next in 2024". It would be great to have more concrete and interesting things highlighted since the current content isn't very convincing. https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/pull/770#discussion_r1461997301 One possibility would be to look at the in-progress PIPs

[VERIFY] Pulsar Release 3.2.0 Candidate 4

2024-01-22 Thread guo jiwei
This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Pulsar version 3.2.0. It fixes the following issues: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/milestone/36?closed=1 *** Please download, test and verify on this release. This release candidate verification will stay open until Jan 28 *** Note that we are

Re: [DISCUSS] Pulsar Year in Review blog post

2024-01-22 Thread Julien Jakubowski
Thank you, Lari. And thank you, Chris, Kiryl & Dave for your input. Just a reminder for the community: could you please give me your input by EOD? I believe the blog post should be published ASAP because it's about 2023, and we're already at the end of January :-) Thanks, Julien On Thu, Jan 18,

Re: [VERIFY] Pulsar Release 3.2.0 Candidate 3

2024-01-22 Thread guo jiwei
Hi Lari, I will build the new candidate-4 soon. Regards Jiwei Guo (Tboy) On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:02 AM Lari Hotari wrote: > Thank you for reviewing and merging the PR #21937 (restoring the broker id > format). I have cherry-picked that to branch-3.2 together with it's > dependency PR