Right. It should be fixed now, tho.
Thanks,
Robby
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Robby, this fix does NOT change the problematic coverage of structures.
Fields are still colored as if they had never been evaluated.
On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:16
2010/7/31 Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org:
There's a whole bunch of these things (in CL and Scheme), and IIRC,
Jens had something very well doone recently -- but they all suffer
from requiring some ugly wrapper syntax around them.
Indeed. In order to keep the wrapping at a minimum I
On Jul 22, Carl Eastlund wrote:
To fix a backwards compatibility bug, I just had to go download PLT
Scheme 4.2.4. It's a real pain to do so. First, the Racket site
doesn't seem to link to versions before 5.0. I had to go to
plt-scheme.org manually. It'd be nice if I could get to the whole
The use of the Y combinator (as opposed to the built-in forms of
recursion) seems to be hacking around the ability for Ruby methods to
be redefined more than anything?
Robby
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi s...@cs.brown.edu
wrote:
...provide a mis-feature that the
4 matches
Mail list logo
