On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
Checklist items for the v5.1.2 release
(using the v5.1.1.900 release candidate build)
* John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org
- Stepper Tests
I've just discovered a bug in the stepper (that was there in 5.1.1 as well).
Let me see
This C code adds the content of one buffer to another one, with no checking.
The corresponding racket code runs about 10x slower. Do you folks think that it
should be possible to do better? (One salient fact: these are
shorts--16-bit-ints--not 32-bit ints.)
John
void addOn(short *dst, int
* Stephen Chang stch...@ccs.neu.edu
- Lazy Racket Tests
- Lazy stepper tests
All passed.
* Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org
- Swindle Tests
- Plot Tests
- Verify that the unix installer works in both modes
- Racket Tree: compare new distribution tree to previous one
Version
What is the data you're using to represent the shorts in Racket?
Robby
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
This C code adds the content of one buffer to another one, with no checking.
The corresponding racket code runs about 10x slower. Do you
On Jul 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
What is the data you're using to represent the shorts in Racket?
#s16vectors.
John
Robby
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
This C code adds the content of one buffer to another one, with
- Stepper Tests
Printing in the Stepper is broken yet again. (I get backquote printing
for the DMdA levels for lists.) I'll try to fix it Monday or Tuesday.
Mike, is the DMdA stepper the same as the HtDP stepper? I'm only
seeing 1 dmda test in collects/tests/stepper but it doesnt have any
* Greg Cooper g...@cs.brown.edu
- FrTime Tests
Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
7 matches
Mail list logo
