Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Matthias Felleisen
I meant literal file copies (or links if that works everywhere). And I think that would satisfy Matthew too. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Re: [racket-dev] DrDr - previous/next change buttons

2012-07-31 Thread Robby Findler
Thanks, this is very helpful! Robby On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote: DrDr now has green buttons to go between times the file's output has changed. Hopefully this will help you find problematic commits easier. Jay -- Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu

Re: [racket-dev] Racket 5.2 on OpenBSD and --enable-backtrace

2012-07-31 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:22 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: Hi. I've a question about --enable-backtrace in the configure step. Is it useful for the users or only is useful for the racket developers?. This option affect to the performance of racket?. It's potentially useful to

Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:45:07 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:52:06 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: If we really want to have two names for these things --- the compatibility name and the compatibility name --- then I think we should at least consolidate to a single

Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: To start afresh, here are two suggestions, which are mutually exclusive. The first is my preference: 1. Revert the addition of `compatibility/package' and `compatibility/mpair', including the documentation changes

Re: [racket-dev] A Const type constructor

2012-07-31 Thread Neil Toronto
On 07/25/2012 07:10 PM, D Herring wrote: On 07/25/2012 12:29 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: What if TR had a notion of const-ness, like in C? Suppose (Vectorof A) is a subtype of (Const-Vectorof B) when A is a subtype of B, and (Const-Vectorof A) is never a subtype of (Vectorof B). In C, const is a

Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Vincent St-Amour
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:26:56 -0700, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: To start afresh, here are two suggestions, which are mutually exclusive. The first is my preference: 1. Revert the addition of

Re: [racket-dev] A Const type constructor

2012-07-31 Thread Matthias Felleisen
On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: To reiterate after my absence: I won't write a typed math/vector until using its exports in Typed Racket wouldn't be a huge friggin' PITA. Let me rephrase this ever so gently. Typed Racket has failed at least one real test for now, namely,

Re: [racket-dev] A Const type constructor

2012-07-31 Thread Vincent St-Amour
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:36:06 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: On Jul 31, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Neil Toronto wrote: To reiterate after my absence: I won't write a typed math/vector until using its exports in Typed Racket wouldn't be a huge friggin' PITA. Let me rephrase this ever so

Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:08:16 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: Mutable pair functions are in `racket/base', I didn't touch these and am not planning to. Mutable list functions, though, I moved. The name is misleading. Should `compatibility/mpair' be `compatibility/mlist' (while `racket/mpair'

Re: [racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

2012-07-31 Thread Vincent St-Amour
At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:04:40 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:08:16 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: Mutable pair functions are in `racket/base', I didn't touch these and am not planning to. Mutable list functions, though, I moved. The name is misleading. Should

Re: [racket-dev] Racket 5.2 on OpenBSD and --enable-backtrace

2012-07-31 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On 07/31/12 15:37, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Mon, 30 Jul 2012 01:50:22 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: Hi. I've a question about --enable-backtrace in the configure step. Is it useful for the users or only is useful for the racket developers?. This option affect to the performance of

Re: [racket-dev] DrDr - previous/next change buttons

2012-07-31 Thread Jay McCarthy
Done :) Jay On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:57 PM, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote: On Jul 30, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: DrDr now has green buttons to go between times the file's output has changed. Hopefully this will help you find problematic commits easier. Here's

Re: [racket-dev] DrDr - previous/next change buttons

2012-07-31 Thread John Clements
On Jul 31, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote: Done :) Thanks! John smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev