9 hours ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:41 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
That's true, but the downside of changing the structure and having
files and directories move post structure change will completely
destroy the relevant edit history of the files, since it will not
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use of git
filter-branch might not retain the history, it should be entirely
possible to do something a little more intelligent and keep that
history.
Just to be clear, this is exactly what you can't
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use of git
filter-branch might not retain the history, it should be entirely
possible to do something a little more intelligent
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use
of git filter-branch might not retain the history, it should
be
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
9 hours ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I was going to comment on the same thing. While a naive use
Just now, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
It doesn't seem wrong to me. It's an accurate representation
of the history of the project, which is exactly what git is
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
Just now, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote:
A few minutes ago, Carl Eastlund wrote:
It doesn't seem wrong to me. It's an accurate
This has a scary feeling to it.
Can you raise the level of discourse one level and perhaps figure out whether
this is needed at all? I.e., find a different way to solve the problem? (What
is the real problem?)
On May 23, 2013, at 1:57 AM, Eric Dobson eric.n.dob...@gmail.com wrote:
Some
There are several identifiers that get introduced via expansion that TR needs
to give types to. Not all are exported. Sam probably knows the reasons why they
are not. I had to use the same code when concocting an analysis of racket core
forms.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Matthias
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Can you raise the level of discourse one level and perhaps figure out whether
this is needed at all? I.e., find a different way to solve the problem? (What
is the real problem?)
This is important, and it's the
1. At some point, we had a macro that opened up modules and made all
module-level identifiers available. Wouldn't a flavor of this macro work here
and, if so, wouldn't it be cheaper? Or is this what you call dumpster-diving,
traversing the expansion and extracting ids from there?
2. Is it
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
1. At some point, we had a macro that opened up modules and made all
module-level identifiers available. Wouldn't a flavor of this macro work here
and, if so, wouldn't it be cheaper? Or is this what you call
On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a bootstrapping-only
violation of our policy that you can add types to Racket w/o modifying
existing modules?
No. We can't specify types inside `racket/base`
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a
bootstrapping-only violation of our policy that you can add types to Racket
w/o
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a bootstrapping-only
violation of our policy that you can add types to Racket w/o
+1
On May 23, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
2. Is it possible that we could solve the problem via a
On May 23, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Given that we're currently working on splitting the entire system to
make this dependency impossible, I don't think this is a viable option
currently.
Perhaps that's a mistake.
_
Racket
Hello Racket devs,
I'm working on tweaking how typing a double quote is handled in strings
when DrRacket's auto parens mode is on, per recent post on the users list.
If any of you use the mode and can offer feedback on the following, it'd be
appreciated: In addition to handling Laurent's initial
This sounds like the right solution to me too.
Robby
On Thursday, May 23, 2013, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
+1
On May 23, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu javascript:;
wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu javascript:; wrote:
On Thursday, May 23, 2013, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
Hello Racket devs,
I'm working on tweaking how typing a double quote is handled in strings
when DrRacket's auto parens mode is on, per recent post on the users list.
If any of you use the mode and can offer feedback on the following, it'd
On May 23, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thursday, May 23, 2013, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
Hello Racket devs,
I'm working on tweaking how typing a double quote is handled in strings when
DrRacket's auto parens mode is on, per recent post on the users list. If any
of you
+1 indeed, that way you can follow easily with typing a paren, thus
enclosing it again.
Laurent
Le 23 mai 2013 17:17, John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org a écrit :
On May 23, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thursday, May 23, 2013, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
Hello Racket
Hi Eli: I'm trying to understand your point. Do I have this right?
Background: The git history consists of a series checkpoints in time of the
entire repository, not a collection of individual files. So, when I do git
log x.rkt then what I get is essentially a filtered list (except where
people
On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that are not
exported, as they want to protect those bindings. TR currently has the
following code which allows it to generate an identifier which is
free-identifier=? to what would appear in the
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 05/23/2013 01:57 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
Some modules have macros which expand into identifiers that are not
exported, as they want to protect those bindings. TR currently has the
following code which allows it to
At Thu, 23 May 2013 07:09:17 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Relevant history is vague.
The history I want corresponds to `git log --follow' on each of the
files that end up in a repository.
The thing that you can't do with
filter-branch is keep the complete history if you remove files from
the
Isn't that exactly what free-indentifier=? is checking for on
identfiers with a module level binding? Or is there something else it
does?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On
Essentially yes. It doesn't do anything else, but it needs an identifier
to do it. Currently, TR starts with a module and a symbol, goes through an
expensive process to forge an identifier from them, just to call
free-identifier=? to compare based on the module and the symbol after all.
Doing
Right, but why cannot we forge an identifier easily? I'm happy getting
an armed identifier. What are the reasons for preventing such a
construction?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Carl Eastlund c...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Essentially yes. It doesn't do anything else, but it needs an identifier to
29 matches
Mail list logo
