I did my first fetch and build of HEAD today, using the new layout. A
few surprises; I wanted to ask if they're as-expected (at least at
this point in the change to the new approach).
If the short answer is, Please go away and try again later after
things have settled down then no worries. :)
At Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:48:06 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
I did my first fetch and build of HEAD today, using the new layout. A
few surprises; I wanted to ask if they're as-expected (at least at
this point in the change to the new approach).
If the short answer is, Please go away and try
Um, aren't we past 5.3.5? Did I do something wrong?
It gets difficult to read with that many dots, but version 5.3.900.7 is
past version 5.3.5 (since 900 is past 5). We'll eventually switch to
5.900.x (and probably should have already).
Yikes, how did my brain parse that as something like
At Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:17:08 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
Maybe I have missed it but is there, or will there be a documentation showing
the dependency of packages. Like package B requires A C and recommends F.
We'll need documentation to say which package provides a given library.
I don't
4 matches
Mail list logo
