Re: [racket-dev] question, issue(?) with the scope of identifiers passed into define-syntax-rule

#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fbase..rkt%29._for-meta%29%29 n racket/base)). On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Lynch thomas.ly...@reasoningtechnology.com wrote: Thank you for that nice explanation. I'm reminded of the scope variables carried in Ruby. In Mathematica the renaming

Re: [racket-dev] question, issue(?) with the scope of identifiers passed into define-syntax-rule

you back hello from within the let form. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Thomas Lynch thomas.ly...@reasoningtechnology.com wrote: I have a simple syntax rule: Welcome to Racket v5.2.1. racket@ (define-syntax-rule (with-tables stem body ...) (let( [table-publication

[racket-dev] ECMA script object write?

I have a racket program that calculates html , there are also bits of ECMAScript in there. I couldn't figure out how to get the html parser bundled with racket to right the structure back out. Same for the ECMA script parser. Did I miss something? (Neil Van Dyke has written a very nice html