And now (finally) the Northwestern snapshots do too.
Robby
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The Racket snapshots at
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
now include the Optimization Coach package.
_
Racket Developers list:
I didn't change the main-distribution package. I changed the Utah
snapshot's configuration to make the Racket distribution have
main-distribution plus optimization-coach.
Changing main-distribution would interfere with a top-level `make`
and other things that are still built around the current
At Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:55:59 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
I didn't change the main-distribution package. I changed the Utah
snapshot's configuration to make the Racket distribution have
main-distribution plus optimization-coach.
Ah, I see. Got it.
Changing main-distribution would interfere
The Racket snapshots at
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
now include the Optimization Coach package.
At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:32:05 +0100, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Our build system can create a distribution from any set of packages,
and so we can easily switch over one of the snapshots to use
Great, thanks!
I didn't see changes to the main repo to reflect that addition. Are the
contents of the main distribution not part of the repo anymore?
Vincent
At Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:46:02 -0600,
Matthew Flatt wrote:
The Racket snapshots at
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
now
On Aug 10, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
[[ Switched mailing list ]]
Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and thus
automatically installed). I think that OC should be there when you download
the full bundle.
+1, and
Ok, let's try to do that. Is there currently a way to include packages
from 3rd party repos to the main distribution?
Vincent
At Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:03:04 -0400,
Greg Hendershott wrote:
Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and
thus automatically installed).
I think you'd have to add a dependency to the 'main-distribution' pkg,
but my guess is that that will require some work internally to make
not be a pain for people who want to build from git. If you have the
inclination, you could give it a try locally and let us know how it
goes?
Robby
On Tue,
but my guess is that that will require some work internally to make
not be a pain for people who want to build from git
Wouldn't this be the ideal case for git submodules?
~Leif Andersen
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Robby Findler ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu
wrote:
I think you'd have to
We discussed the possibility git submodules last year, and I think the
consensus was that it wouldn't work well. We did attach the
native-library repo (for Mac OS X and Windows) as a submodule to the
main Racket repo, and that worked well enough, but I think it has
worked only because the
Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and thus
automatically installed). I think that OC should be there when you download
the full bundle.
Definitely.
1. It's very useful.
2. Its existence says, Racket optimization is a thing.
3. It's used with one of Racket's
[[ Switched mailing list ]]
Being in the main repo is different from being in the distribution (and thus
automatically installed). I think that OC should be there when you download the
full bundle.
-- Matthias
On Aug 9, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
It used to be.
When
12 matches
Mail list logo
