At Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:31:43 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
Matthew, would it make more sense to have unsafe-vector-ref (and related
functions) be the more general function and unsafe-vector*-ref be the one
that doesn't work on chaperoned vectors? That is just swap the definitions.
That way user
On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:07:18, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Kathy Gray kathryn.g...@cl.cam.ac.uk
- Test Engine Tests
Done
-Kathy
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
* Greg Cooper g...@cs.brown.edu
- FrTime Tests
Done.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
The new case- only supports simple contracts, that's right. If you
have more complex ones that it would be helpful to support (and can
share them), that would help us guide our efforts.
Thanks,
Robby
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Doug Williams
m.douglas.willi...@gmail.com wrote:
The main
On Oct 24, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Doug Williams wrote:
On the case- problem, it seems it no longer supports anything but -. Is
there something I am missing there?
This is a current limitation for case- as provided by racket/contract. When I
tackle the conversion of case- to proxies/chaperones, I
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Stevie Strickland sstri...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Oct 24, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Doug Williams wrote:
On the case- problem, it seems it no longer supports anything but -. Is
there something I am missing there?
This is a current limitation for case- as provided by
6 matches
Mail list logo
