Hi. The last days I've been reading the code within gmplonglong.h and
I've a question/request. Why there is assembler code? Why not just to
remove the assembler code and to use the C fallback for every CPU?.
These days the racket developers (and users) mostly only test their code
on amd64,
Below is the latest release notes draft. Comments?
Robby
Racket has a new package system, including a catalog of already available
packages. Please visit
http://pkgs.racket-lang.org/
for an overview.
Recent releases included the beta versions of the package system.
Racket version 6.0
On the program
(time
(for/fold ([v (for/fold ([v 1]) ([i (in-range 1)])
(* (add1 i) v))])
([i (in-range 1)])
(/ v (add1 i
when compiling for 32-bit x86 with the latest XCode's clang and using a
2013 MacBook Pro running Mavericks, I get a 50% speed
I will give a try to your example.
I disabled the assembler code in the OpenBSD port because with your last
patch to gmplonglong and clang, the 5.3.6 math lib was broken on i386.
We will have the CVS lock soon and I want be very careful now. I used
initially clang to fix a crash in udp.rktl,
4 matches
Mail list logo
