On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
* John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org
- Stepper Tests
Done.
Updates:
- Stepper Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.1 as the most current version; email me
to pick the changes when they're done, or
I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a
code. Is something in the pipeline not working?
-Ian
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Ok it turns out I had done (syntax/loc stx #’template) instead of (syntax/loc
stx template) and somehow that seems to have triggered some kind of infinite
recursive loop or something.
But I fixed it and got another error that makes no sense at all.
It seems like somehow a struct constructor
On 07/21/2014 02:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:37:36 -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote:
On 07/17/2014 05:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu
Release tests for (one of the) linux releases:
- Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases
What web browser are you using?
I was only able to make an account using Chromium. (Firefox didn't work for me.)
~Leif Andersen
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a
code. Is
I've tried both now. No go.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: Leif Andersen l...@leifandersen.net
To: J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu
Cc: dev dev@racket-lang.org
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:35:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket-dev] pkg account creator not working?
At Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:03:12 -0400,
Ryan Culpepper wrote:
* Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu,
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu
- Match Tests
- Typed Racket Tests
Done.
- Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY
(updates should show v6.1 as the most current version; email
On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case
too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change)
I just realized that `flatten-begin` actually doesn't care if the form
starts with a `begin`. In
On 2014-07-21 16:14:27 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release?
This came up on IRC the other day. I think Eric was saying the main
changes were inference speedups, support for contracted functions, and
better keyword support.
Cheers,
Asumu
At Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:24:24 -0400,
Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2014-07-21 16:14:27 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release?
This came up on IRC the other day. I think Eric was saying the main
changes were inference speedups, support for contracted
Yes, I agree. I don't have a good suggestion for the name, tho. Sorry.
Robby
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case
too. Anyone have any
11 matches
Mail list logo
