On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:28 PM, John Clements wrote:
1) In sentences such as DrScheme is a part of PLT Scheme, I'm guessing this
should turn into DrRacket is a part of the Racket project, or something
similar.
DrRacket is PLT's IDE for the Racket programming language.
2) More generally,
...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
It is unfortunate that the name TeachScheme! requires an immediate
explanation. :)
Robby
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
Thanks for reminding me and for getting started.
I have made small changes to the page (de
On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
To clarify, I'm proposing that this be a part of the core
I agree with this goal and the name. We could call it 'collections' hierarchy
as in Java, but I don't think that this is a good name. Ideally, I'd like to
call it
Why don't you use make parallel setup the standard?
On Jul 2, 2010, at 4:44 PM, Kevin Tew wrote:
raco setup -u will build collects in parallel, using all the cores your
machine has.
rack setup -u -j X ie (-j 2) can be used to throttle parallel build to only
use X cores.
Parallel
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Some examples that show how useful this is:
* In the lazy language you want the implicit begin to force all
expressions except for the last one.
* I've redefined the implicit begin (in an ugly way) for my course
language to force
This sounds like we should give up on stratification.
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
On Jul 6, Petey Aldous wrote:
That would be interesting and it would not be terribly difficult to
instrument setup-plt to do it.
There's no reason to do that -- the data is all there
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
#%module-begin as the top level controlling macro is a distinguishing
feature. Requires and provides can only be there and you know there's
only one application.
These could be an argument to the #%...-begin macro:
are-you-top-level? :: (U
See top of lang/private/teachprims.rkt for note on testing.
I tend to run them with load.
On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
If I execute Racket.exe -f racket/htdp.rktl I get the error:
racket/beg-adv.rktl:2:1: htdp-syntax-test: this function is not
defined in:
And which is which :-)
On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
Do ask the person who asked whether Python has coverage now. -- Matthias
Aspirin vs vitamins.
Shriram
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
That's totally different from what Shriram described.
On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Guillaume Marceau wrote:
During
There is good support from the interviews for having dynamic
documentation in DrRacket would help quite a bit. Two out of the four
students I interview requested the feature.
I have considered this issue. I decided that these kinds of kids should be
introduced to Universe programs as opposed to World programs. That's way cooler
than silly one-keyboard games.
-- Matthias
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
As far as I know, at the lowest level
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
I have considered this issue. I decided that these kinds of kids
should be introduced to Universe programs as opposed to World
programs. That's way cooler than silly one-keyboard games.
Doom is silly? Duke Nukem 3D is silly?
Thanks for all the ideas. Just to clarify: this spring I modified the API of
Universe to accommodate this form of 'multiple' keypresses. I have to work out
examples and probably add one more handler to get this 'right' (for beginners).
(The person who posted isn't really a beginner in the
If this hasn't come up yet here, please do take a look at
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/there-are-a-hell-of-a-lot-of-haskell-libraries-now-what-are-we-going-to-do-about-it/
I am sure we will face this kind of problem one day and we might be able to
prepare ourselves a bit.
if others are interested.
Cheers,
yc
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
If this hasn't come up yet here, please do take a look at
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/there-are-a-hell-of-a-lot-of-haskell-libraries-now-what-are-we-going
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:26 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
* The core type system of Typed Racket has been substantially
revised. In particular, Typed Racket can now follow significantly
more sophisticated reasoning about the relationships between
predicates. Additionally, Typed Racket
untrusted code to do that and there's the can
of worms related to system dependencies.
Jay
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
If this hasn't come up yet here, please do take a look at
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/there-are-a-hell
On Jul 28, 2010, at 12:26 AM, YC wrote:
Other package systems separate the installation step from the import step
Indeed, this is the key design decision separating us from the rest of the
world, and it is not clear whether it was a good decision.
On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Jay McCarthy
On Jul 28, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Dave Gurnell wrote:
Racket's main distribution is big and takes time to compile and install. I'd
personally be in favour of a leaner core distribution with more code in
external packages, so I can choose what I download when I'm only interested
in a single
I have finally taken the time to design a controller for an object that
allows the use of multiple arrow keys. Two insights: it is doable and it
is a truly insightful exercise on state machines. Most of the 'bullet'
points at the top of the program came about because I designed and explored.
On Friday, July 30, 2010, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I have finally taken the time to design a controller for an object that
allows the use of multiple arrow keys. Two insights: it is doable and it
is a truly insightful exercise on state machines. Most of the 'bullet
On Aug 2, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
1. doesn't have a counterpart for *untyped* code;
...
Overall, the status of representation-hiding in Typed Racket seems rather
weird.
These two lines together explain it all. TR is about moving code from the
untyped world into
Sam, this is an interesting question and you should look into it because the
answer isn't obvious:
(module A typed/racket (provide map))
passes map from 'somewhere' through A to two contexts: typed and untyped
modules. Given that all provides slap on contracts in TR -- that's what the
On Aug 2, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
This is the same code as above. Did you mean something different?
See my message. I had fixed it. Cap t in first line!
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
Pardon me for mentioning ML. Yes, Jim Morris suggested ADTs without using the
name and the Clu people in their paper on infinitely high-level languages
(yeap!) introduced the terms. That doesn't change a thing about the content of
my statement.
On Aug 2, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Shriram
On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Paul Steckler wrote:
I may have missed a post on this topic, but has anyone built an LLVM back-end
for mzc?
Eli and an undergraduate (Alex Friedman) started on this a few years ago
and got reasonably far. They could compile a bunch of small stuff, and the
LLVM
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:08 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
works in Beginner. It turns out however that even the German docs are
broken. I should have explored more when Mike merged this in. Then
again, I doubt we will have many Americans reading
There's code and there's code. I don't think slideshow is at the level of
Racket or Typed Racket or DrRacket. If it went away, I'd have no trouble
changing the ten or twenty files in my world that use it. Sure, I'd lose a few
days but if I lost Racket, I'd lose a year and more.
-- Matthias
I, with Paul's help, worked the entire Web server through MrSpidey and
eliminated all but those checks that Herman-Meunier later showed how to
eliminate with their ICFP paper. That's far more than testing in some sense
even if it doesn't show that it serves.
Paul set up automatic stress
Yes. I started using the phrase I have bug reports, therefore I exist at
Rice. I think Jay should add this phrase right next to the other quote.
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Guys: we need one more thing to go into the beginning of these
guidelines. Specifically, we
) is written to.
After the first access per page, additional mutations on that page have no
extra cost, until the gc collects again.
Mutating objects living in the nursery has no gc overhead.
Kevin
On 08/24/2010 08:18 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Yes, I was taught the same thing in 1984. That's
So at this point, we don't really know what the relative costs are. -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Aug 24, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
When the GC is well-tuned, it's difficult to slow a program down by
using mutation --- especially relative to all the other ways you can
slow a program down.
This is good enough for me to correct my old belief about mutation and GCing.
On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
Anyone else have comments/suggestions?
Robby's idea of allowing students to choose how a RUN actually worked occurred
to me too but I had a different behavior in mind. Instead of opening a separate
window, I'd much rather see a
Just in case you're wondering, there are no volunteers yet.
On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
We are looking for a volunteer for the 'bug czar' position. The person's
responsibility is
-- to read bug reports as they come in
-- to guess who is responsible
I am pleased to introduce Ryan as our new bug czar.
Thanks to everyone else who volunteered.
-- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
I built drrackt from scratch tonight around 7:30. When I started it up, I got
the following N error message.
Error in phase 2 for tool
#path:/Users/matthias/plt/collects/frtime/tool/frtime-tool.ss; FrTime
Language
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/drracket/private/tools-drs.rkt: FrTime Language
On Sep 21, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
And a side-comment -- having an on-line documentation is probably
going to make lots of people who follow the repository happy, since
compiling it is where the biggest chunk of time is spent.
No, no. See my comment. The improvements to the
Don't talk it to death with long emails. Help people to get this started. --
Matthias
On Sep 22, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
On Sep 22, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
Eli Barzilay wrote at 09/22/2010 01:18 AM:
The punchline is that your desire to use a local copy is in direct
I agree with ELi here.
On Sep 25, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
An hour ago, Everett Morse wrote:
Comments on the below discussion and possible implementation ideas.
User-contributed comments should be annotations to the
documentation. They could then be fetched using JS (Ajax)
1. I consider concise readability as superior to short unreadability. In this
spirit, #true and #false are an improvement. I understand that more perfect
people than myself will never conflate #t with #f, but since it happened to
Matthew, I am happy not be alone. (And that happened before I
On Oct 10, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I too am in favor of when, unless, and cond being definition contexts.
+1.
I routinely wrap cond/when in let () for just that purpose.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
My changes in response to pr11xyz.
I ran the language test suite. I had no clue that language
changes can affect drrracket test suites. Sorry.
Done.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
The teaching language error message wording changed slightly, breaking
some of the
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
My changes in response to pr11xyz.
I ran the language test suite. I had no clue that language
changes can affect drrracket test suites. Sorry.
Done.
On Oct 14, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Robby Findler wrote
On Oct 14, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
No problem. That's what drdr is for! :)
But I'll go ahead and add you to the relevant test suites
I will factor out the error message generation for 2htdp/*sl. Perhaps I can
combine it with htdp/error.
You should then be able to simplify the drracket tests.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
Are they typed?
On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Doug Williams wrote:
I downloaded the pre-release version this morning - 10/20 (I believe it was a
build from 10/16). The plot package and plot extensions in the science
collection all work as expected. But, I am getting different numeric
F1 doesn't work on a recent git:
browser-run: process execute failed: '(#path:/usr/bin/osascript -e open
location
On Oct 27, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
Also, don't forget that we moved the signatures to ASL (and improved
various aspects of the implementation).
And be sure to tell them that it is all un(English)documented.
Do we really want to encourage the current syntax for heaven's
http://landoflisp.com/?ref=nf
Enjoy -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
And everybody else sees that you learned this from the __implementation__
rather than the __documentation__ :-)
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
nevermind, I see preferences:add-to-general-checkbox-panel in
drracket/private/main.rkt
On 11/01/2010 10:27 PM, Jon Rafkind
On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:40 AM, namekuseijin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:13 AM, John Clements
cleme...@brinckerhoff.org wrote:
;; NOW I'M A STUDENT:
;; only-long-strings : (listof string) - (listof string)
;; return a list containing the strings longer than 2 chars
(define/noloop
A factor of 2.+.
(We could provide a type system, take away recursion, and replace it with a
structural induction form. It would be impossible to write infinite loops.)
On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:41 PM, John Clements wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Your
submitted as bug report
On Nov 11, 2010, at 7:54 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
On 11/11/10 7:34 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
The check-within in the follow program (in BSL/ISL) seems to hang.
I see DrRacket (5.0.1, 5.0.99) loop on this:
_
/pages/1000-people-for-kids-programming-videogames-with-algebra/174472965903551]
-- Matthias
Begin forwarded message:
From: Emmanuel Schanzer schan...@bootstrapworld.org
Date: November 14, 2010 10:02:12 AM EST
To: Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
Subject: Facebook Campaign for Bootstrap
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/common/freeze.rkt:9:0
internal-error
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/common/freeze.rkt:36:0
constrained-reply
/Users/matthias/plt/collects/mred/private/wx/cocoa/window.rkt:151:2
I can confirm this behavior and I consider it a bug. I have submitted a bug
(#11448) in your name so that you hear back when we get around to fixing it.
In the meantime, I propose you use the work arounds that you have figured out.
Sorry for any inconvenience -- Matthias
On Nov 18,
Is
A[e_1 e_2] = A[e_1] meta A[e_2]
compositional? How about
A[e_1 e_2]env = A[e_1]env meta A[e_2]env
or
A[e_1 e_2]env k = A[e_1]env (\x_1. A[e_2]env (\x_2. k (x_1 meta x_2)))
or
A[e_1 e_2]env k s = A[e_1]env (\x_1s_1. A[e_2]env (\x_2 s_2. k (x_1 meta
x_2) s_?) s_1
etc
I ran a built from scratch and got this:
MASTER READ ERROR - reading from worker: read-char: input port is closed
KILLING WORKER 1 #worker
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
This shows up in my console when I load insert large letters for the first
time. It did not show up with the gracket1.
(process:56316): Pango-WARNING **: couldn't load font Snell Roundhand Medium
Not-Rotated 24, falling back to Sans Medium Not-Rotated 24, expect ugly
output.
On Nov 27, 2010, at 4:31 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
this does not require plugging together components using units and
signatures; sometimes those tools are indispensable, but they're also
cumbersome
Have you tried the new ones? They work smoothly for most of the time, almost
like modules
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
(The above errors were all over the old pages for years without being
discovered...)
Berkeley would have asked if they are really errors then :-)
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
That said, massive backwards incompatibility as Jay is proposing seems wrong.
+ a lot
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
In Safari this error doesn't show up.
On Dec 1, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Four hours ago, engin...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
2. Search Manuals breaks the browser's Back button. Here's a simple
example.
a. Open http://docs.racket-lang.org/
b. Type modulus in the search manuals
-definitions.txt
On 11/29/2010 03:34 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
That makes sense. For now, I am fine with this very first-order
approximation. Thanks
On Nov 29, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
There is one thing defined at phase 0, module-begin. The module exports
a bunch of stuff
Jay, coercions aka casts in our world are compound words with - in between
them. Why do you need a new name?
(There is an inconsistency in their behavior. To wit
Welcome to Racket v5.0.99.4.
(integer-char 1000)
integer-char: expects argument of type exact integer in [0,#x10],
stuff to inputs and outputs.
Jay
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
The string-number primitive is probably closer to what Jay wants to do.
The only contract I can think of for string-number is
;; Number - Boolean
(define (string-number
The interoperability comment just hit me. What we might be discovering is
basically Jacob's thesis in practice. It isn't so much contracts+X that we're
looking at to implement interoperability, but contracts = interop-stuff +
blame-mechnism + possibly-more. Jay is trying to reuse the first
If we take it out of editor%, we should not encounter any problems
whatsoever. It is possible that additional implements-interface checks will
succeed, but I am doubtful. Other than that I can't think of any problems.
Should Asumu try and just run the whole test suite and if it works you
So how do you use it? I entered
code:
and I got a huge stack trace.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
I whipped up a webservice that provides full text search on the racket
tree. Its written in java using lucene+jetty. It doesn't have a lot of
bells and whistles right now
How difficult is it to implement one as a Planet lib that avoids tracking?
On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
One issue to consider with Recaptcha is that it's incidentally a Web bug that
helps track people around the Internet. If you don't already have Web bugs
in your
, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
All of this discussion suggests that we start developing RacketII, a language
that is a true break from Scheme. Our backward compatibility constraints are
just overwhelming our knowledge of what we know is 'bad' with Racket
I decided to report on the few occasions when I switch from DrRacket to Emacs
to accomplish something Racket-related.
Just now I changed
(connect* S round-n round-n-ne round-ne)
(connect* SW round-ne round-ne-se round-se)
(connect* NW round-se round-se-s round-s)
Most of the time I do get email when Ryan assigns me a bug
On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I didn't know that it doesn't send out emails to the responsible if it
was set by changing the category... It does sound like a problem if
it doesn't do that. I'll try to play with
I am getting this:
. . instantiate: superclass already initialized by class initialization for
class: admin%
1. There is a single new expression in the buffer
2. There is no superclassing
Any hints before I try to create a bug report?
: instantiate:
superclass already initialized by class initialization for class:
unsaved-editor2155:3:7
but I don't know how you're making admin% do that.
Robby
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
I am getting this:
. . instantiate
Since we are releasing soon, I thought I'd remind everyone that we are getting
these strange internal error messages from drracket when the mouse moves over
the leftmargin/control panel in some way;
on-move in window%: expected argument of type exact integer in [-1,
1]; given
In principle I'd love to see this kind of functionality in the core. I will
read the 'guide' (aka your submission) and let's work on my 'turn' example to
see how it fits.
-- Matthias
On Jan 7, 2011, at 8:17 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I've recently prepared an extension to the contract
This showed up in the console from where I launched drracket:
file #f produces eof from read-language
port-next-location (#f #f 36)
str ;; Xexpr - [Listof (Cons Nat Nat)]
The string is a part of my program.
_
For list-related
Two complaints in one day about the wording of these clauses. Let's do
something about the English.
I have another one, unrelated: I don't like the 'self-blame'. I have
encountered this now a couple of times, and I think we should use the Eiffel
terminology of
promised
required
I think the bottom line is that we should stick to the explicit notion of
re-exporting and this 'feels' right given the general eq? problem.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
I think the bottom line is that we should stick to the explicit notion of
re-exporting and this 'feels' right given the general eq? problem.
_
For list-related
I am totally with you. (I don't understand how you can satisfy Carl's scenario
and keep it inexpensive but all the power to you.)
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Stevie Strickland wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
But I don't think we should think of it as 'changing
On Jan 15, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
do you think this change I'm suggesting (act as if the contract were written
a second time) is the right behavior
1. My personal preference is to ask programmers to re-provide identifiers with
explicit contracts that are ideally stated and
On Jan 15, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Stevie Strickland wrote:
I assumed that Matthias meant that he'd like to see the _positive_ blame
shifted to the re-exporting module, which would cause the issue.
yes.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
1. My personal preference is to ask programmers to re-provide identifiers
with explicit contracts that are ideally stated and specified in a separate
'contracts.rkt' file per collects/project basis. I.e., the current world is
my
On Jan 15, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Casey Klein wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Stevie Strickland
sstri...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
I think that we are just throwing up stumbling blocks. It is really a
design choice (does a reprovide carry over
But Casey says the _client_ broke the contract. It's irrelevant where things
come from when the client breaks the contracts.
On Jan 16, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Matthias Felleisen
matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 5:05 PM
On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
The redex module does an all-from-out provide on what it gets from
redex/reduction-semantics and redex/pict, making it the negative party
on the contracts. When a redex client breaks one of the contracts,
redex gets blamed instead of the
On Jan 17, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Robby Findler
ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu wrote:
So far as I understand it, we have: Stevie opposed, Matthias neutral,
Robby
On Jan 17, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
Let me summarize what was important in Casey's message that relates to
this. He has these files:
redex/gui.rkt
redex/reduction-semantics.rkt
redex/main.rkt
The first two export subsets of the Redex library (in order to make it
Anyone up for a dissertation? Multi-stepping debugging is, eh, pushing it.
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Doug Orleans wrote:
The following program was a puzzle in the 2011 MIT Mystery Hunt held last
weekend. (I'm not linking directly to the site because they posted a
solution and I
On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:
Keeping a system up to date can be tricky; for set it and forget it systems
I tend to use the LTS version of Ubuntu with unattended-upgrades and Ksplice
for kernel security patches. There's no guarantee that you won't be affected
by a
I wanted to say thank you for adding 'saved bug reports' -- it was so helpful
while Eli's machine was 'away' -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
POPL 2012 will probably sport a paper on Scratch then ...
On Jan 23, 2011, at 8:28 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote:
http://byob.berkeley.edu/Church.pdf
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Interesting point. With types, this issue just goes away.
(No matter what, I argue that Lazy should be totally compatible
in contracts/types/argument order with Racket. Nothing else
makes sense.)
On Jan 30, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
The lazy `take' has another reason to
I don't know how to replicate this of course, but as of today, it has become
unresponsive to actions three times already. One of them could have been a
release candidate but I was unable to even see the version info.
_
For list-related
exception.
Robby
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu
wrote:
I don't know how to replicate this of course, but as of today, it has become
unresponsive to actions three times already. One of them could have been a
release candidate but I was unable
deleted prefs, recompiled, and it's working now. STRANGE.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Dear Developers, we need ideas and input.
We have decided to reorganize the systems maintenance tasks over the
next few months. Part of the goal is to modernize, and part of the goal
is to give Eli more time for real projects.
Our first stage should involve outsourcing various services, where
1 - 100 of 602 matches
Mail list logo
