Yes, I see some of this at the bottom of the chapter 16 in the guide, and
the recursion supported with
(require
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/require.html#%28form._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fbase..rkt%29._require%29%29
(for-meta
Warning I am still a Racket intermediate user but I've been studying
syntactic extensions a lot the past several months.
The problem here is macros in Racket have lexical scope just like
procedures, they are hygienic macros. The identifiers you introduced in the
with-tables macro only exist or
But I think it’s important that it doesn’t use gensym or something like that,
it uses syntax-marks, which means you can break these lexical scoping rules if
you want/need to by using either syntax-local-introduce or datum-syntax:
#lang racket
(require syntax/parse/define)
(define-simple-macro
Thank you for that nice explanation. I'm reminded of the scope variables
carried in Ruby. In Mathematica the renaming of module variables is
explicit. There do not appear to be run phases there. Also thanks for the
working example using syntax parse. Thus far I have working examples using
4 matches
Mail list logo
