Re: [sc-dev] RATE function; issue 15090

2008-02-11 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Eike, Eike Rathke schrieb: Hi Regina, On Monday, 2008-02-11 12:09:25 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: for those, who read this. I've discussed it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've found a comment in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Windows#Extra_requirements with link for gperf

Re: [sc-dev] CWS odff resynced to m244

2008-02-11 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Kohei, On Monday, 2008-02-11 10:37:05 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: I just had a minor build issue on Linux with gcc 4.1.2. The attached patch fixed it. Thanks, I applied that to the CWS. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign

Re: [sc-dev] RATE function; issue 15090

2008-02-11 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Monday, 2008-02-11 12:56:00 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: the filters aren't essential anyway. This if course was not meant to misclassify Daniel's great work! The filters are just not needed for the area Regina works on. Sorry if that could had been mistakable.. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc

Re: [sc-dev] RATE function; issue 15090

2008-02-11 Thread Regina Henschel
Hello all, for those, who read this. I've discussed it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've found a comment in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Windows#Extra_requirements with link for gperf http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/gperf.htm That is the version 3.0.1. Daniel Rentz told me that

Re: [sc-dev] CWS odff resynced to m244

2008-02-11 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Eike, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 14:35 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi, I resynced CWS odff to m244. Please submit any future patches to interpr*.cxx or compiler.cxx or token.cxx and related as a diff based on that CWS until it will be integrated to the master. I just had a minor build issue on