hi, all
Can someone tell me how 'TAB' key works?
Bug phenomenon can be described as follows:
1.open one new Calc
2.create more than one scenario
3.invoke navigator
4.click Scenarios button
5.click 'TAB' key continuously, you can find that the cursor skips the
scenario
Hi Frank,
Frank Loehmann schrieb:
specification here:
http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/features/Solver.odt
Thank you, for your help. Unfortunately the Sepc does not define
Epsilon Level used by the implemented algorithm. Can you point me
to a definition?
Gruß
Stefan
Hi Stefan,
The item is defined in section 1.4.2 (Item #3). I think Niklas (NN)
could describe the functional behavior behind this setting if needed.
Best regards,
Frank
Stefan Weigel wrote:
Hi Frank,
Frank Loehmann schrieb:
specification here:
Hello!
Should using labels work also in a array formula?
Today it doesn't.
E. g. having a column labelled 'Result'.
=SUM('Result')
works. But
{=SUM('Result'0)}
doesn't work. The results (error or 0) differs, if i insert label ranges
(Insert\Names\Labels...) or not.
Should i file a issue? I
Thanks again, Frank.
Frank Loehmann schrieb:
The item is defined in section 1.4.2 (Item #3). I think Niklas (NN)
could describe the functional behavior behind this setting if needed.
Niklas, can you join this thread? :-)
specification here:
Hi Eike,
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:29 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
They should be merged into the SymbolsNative map
instead.
I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me
that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it
will not be possible to switch
Hi David,
On Monday, 2008-03-17 21:23:07 +, David King wrote:
On the other hand ;) in Calc {=ISLOGICAL({TRUE;cat;dog})}
returns {FALSE;TRUE;TRUE}
Can I raise that one as an issue? Can't be right, can it?
That indeed is a bug, please file an issue.
Thanks
Eike
--
OOo/SO Calc
Hi Kohei,
On Monday, 2008-03-17 21:23:11 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
[... separators at ScAddress::Convention ...]
Well, that code was implemented before ScGrammar arrived in DEV300_m2.
So, I couldn't have used ScGrammar at the time I implemented.
Understood.
Of course now that we have
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 14:13:43 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me
that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it
will not be possible to switch between the Excel style separators and
the
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 22:37 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 14:13:43 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'd like to make sure one thing before I go with this. It seems to me
that, if we tie the separators to ScCompiler::mxSymbolsNative, then it
will not be
Hi Yue,
On Tuesday, 2008-03-18 15:07:56 +0800, Lvyue wrote:
I began to work on issue78781 yesterday.
Fine, thanks.
Compared with Excel, I found there are two things I should modify.
1. while input: =INDEX($D$27:$P$27;2)
the result should be value of E27.
Correct. For a row vector the
11 matches
Mail list logo
