Facelets and Tiger annotations work fine for me. I'm not using the
view controller stuff yet (@Init) but @Bean and @Property work fine
for me. As soon as I finish refactoring for the new package names I
will check into shale-goodies.
Sean
On 8/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
thx,
but I still get this error. I hope I've time to look deeper into it.
-Matt
snip
javax.faces.el.PropertyNotFoundException: /index.xhtml @23,102
value=#{helloWorldBacking.name}: Target Unreachable, identifier
'helloWorldBacking' resolved to null
at
Looking at Shale Test, specifically the AbstractJsfTestCase I noticed
that the method signatures of the JUnit setup tearDown methods have
been altered so that they no longer can throw exceptions.
Just wondering if the throws Exception can be added back to these
methods so they stay true to
I've attached an HTML file that documents Shale Remoting. It would be nice if some kind committer could drop it into $SHALE_HOME/framework/trunk/src/site/xdoc/features-remoting.xml and commit that XML file. I would've given you the XML file directly, but 'mvn site' isn't exactly working for me at
On 8/8/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached an HTML file that documents Shale Remoting. It would be nice
if some kind committer could drop it into
$SHALE_HOME/framework/trunk/src/site/xdoc/features-remoting.xml
and commit that XML file. I would've given you the XML file
Attachment didn't seem to go through. Could you file a ticket? You
can send me the file directly I'll still have to open a ticket to
commit it.
Greg
On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, David Geary wrote:
I've attached an HTML file that documents Shale Remoting. It would
be nice if some kind
Will do.
david
2006/8/8, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Attachment didn't seem to go through. Could you file a ticket? You
can send me the file directly I'll still have to open a ticket to
commit it.
Greg
On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:25 PM, David Geary wrote:
I've attached an HTML file that
On 8/8/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about setting up a confluence wiki for Shale?
Wendy tipped me off about cwiki.apache.org. Apparently its up and
running now. Personally I think Confluence is a lot better then the
current wiki.
I wanted it from the
This issue[1] is the last functionality related one flagged in JIRA for
1.0.3. Do we still want to do it first, or can we target that for a later
release and move on towards getting 1.0.3 out the door now?
Craig
[1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-219
2006/8/8, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/8/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached an HTML file that documents Shale Remoting. It would be
nice
if some kind committer could drop it into
$SHALE_HOME/framework/trunk/src/site/xdoc/features-remoting.xml
and commit that XML
On 8/8/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's still some work to be done on remoting documentation, but this
should get us 60%, or so, of the way there.
I'm working with it now.
BTW, what error are you getting from 'mvn site' ?
--
Wendy
strong +1 on that.
we use that at work.
pretty awesome!
On 8/8/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people think about setting up a confluence wiki for Shale?
Wendy tipped me off about cwiki.apache.org. Apparently its up and
running now. Personally I think Confluence is a lot
While I tend to lean toward the 'use OSS when possible' side,
Confluence is a sexy wiki.
If we can get a confluence instance, how feasible would it be to:
- move all the documentation to the wiki
- have that content available as a PDF to replace what we moved
We could even go so far as to
2006/8/8, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/8/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's still some work to be done on remoting documentation, but this
should get us 60%, or so, of the way there.
I'm working with it now.
Thanks.
BTW, what error are you getting from 'mvn site' ?
1.0.3 is going to be another alpha/beta release right?
We still need to fix the dialog issues such as SHALE-48 before we go
legit right? I'm assuming the goal is to have a solid 1.0.4 release
just before Apache Con no? If so, then I imagine we're going to be
busy in September.
My personal
On 8/8/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.0.3 is going to be another alpha/beta release right?
That's my thinking ... dialog and tiles are still problem areas. But
there's a bunch of new stuff and bugfixes plus the new build infrastructure
that people can leverage now.
We still
16 matches
Mail list logo
