Re: Test 1.0.3 Artifacts (Round 2)

2006-08-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree with both sides of this argument and to me, there is no ideal solution. I think at this stage (serious but not final evaluation) we just keep -SNAPSHOT and ask users to download and review. Before voting we can tweak the version

[VOTE] Shale Version 1.0.3 Release

2006-08-20 Thread Craig McClanahan
At long last :-), the bits are ready for a vote. All of the following files have md5 and sha1 checksums, and are in addition signed by my code signing key. They correspond to revision 433108 in the SVN repository, which I'm about to tag as APACHE_SHALE_1_0_3. (1) Maven Snapshot Repository At

Re: [VOTE] Shale Version 1.0.3 Release

2006-08-20 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/20/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At long last :-), the bits are ready for a vote. All of the following files have md5 and sha1 checksums, and are in addition signed by my code signing key. ... The PGP signatures are good, but the .md5 and .sha1 checksums do not include

Re: Test 1.0.3 Artifacts (Round 2)

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
We can tweak the procedure next time ... but for this time I'm going to try to role the final set of bits to propose for the vote this evening. Can we please hold up on commits until after I finish that, tag it, and update the POMs for 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT? That will work. Craig Sean