@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [dialog2] Current status
On 9/12/06, THOMAS, JAYANT (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where Can I get this code, I would like to test it out, Also I am
planning on using different markup language for different browsers ,
ie
more focused on vxml and just simulator for HTML , looks
Not having installed any of the shale POMs lately (*-1.0.4-SNAPSHOT),
things ran well after I installed those.
Looks good, this is exciting stuff!
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:12 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 9/12/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip-entire-email/
:-)
PS: Now, on to getting the SCXML implementation up to date with the API
changes ...
snap/
Should be more or less there now. I've created a test app for the
SCXML bits as well, all feedback on that is welcome.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 4:23 PM
To: dev@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [dialog2] Current status
On 9/11/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip-entire-email/
:-)
PS: Now, on to getting the SCXML implementation up to date with the
API
changes ...
snap
On 9/12/06, THOMAS, JAYANT (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where Can I get this code, I would like to test it out, Also I am
planning on using different markup language for different browsers , ie
more focused on vxml and just simulator for HTML , looks like I have to
create my own JSF
On 9/12/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip-entire-email/
:-)
PS: Now, on to getting the SCXML implementation up to date with the API
changes ...
snap/
Should be more or less there now. I've created a test app for the
(top-posting on purpose)
And no action states to stuff in dialog data makes things cleaner still !
As an aside, I've restored 1.4 source compatibility for the
shale-dialog2-legacy module. I believe that any module that doesn't
inherently need tiger features should stay at 1.4 source.
Can a
On 9/11/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(top-posting on purpose)
And no action states to stuff in dialog data makes things cleaner still !
Yep. I even tried to remove inferences (in the top level APIs) that the
underlying mechanism has to be a state machine, although I imagine
