On 8/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with both sides of this argument and to me, there is no ideal
solution. I think at this stage (serious but not final evaluation) we
just keep -SNAPSHOT and ask users to download
On 8/23/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
So my proposal is to involve everyone in the beta testing but do not
distribute the final version to vote on so we can
On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with both sides of this argument and to me, there is no ideal
solution. I think at this stage (serious but not final evaluation) we
just keep -SNAPSHOT and ask users to download and review. Before
voting we can tweak the version
We can tweak the procedure next time ... but for this time I'm going to try
to role the final set of bits to propose for the vote this evening. Can we
please hold up on commits until after I finish that, tag it, and update the
POMs for 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT?
That will work.
Craig
Sean
On 8/18/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: If you have previously installed 1.0.3 artifacts from the earlier
test build evaluation into your local repository, you will need to manually
replace them, because these are not SNAPSHOT version numbers.
A non-SNAPSHOT version
On 8/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/18/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING: If you have previously installed 1.0.3 artifacts from the
earlier
test build evaluation into your local repository, you will need to
manually
replace them, because these are not
