+1
(checked md5/sha1)
Cheers,
Stefan
On 8/17/14 11:11 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
Anyone else?
2014-08-12 9:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Munteanu romb...@apache.org:
+1
Robert
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
Hi,
I'm working on various experiments (like [1]) related to continuous
deployment with Sling, and having a clearer definition of the various
roles of the content that a typical Sling applications manages would
help. I'm saying roles instead of types on purpose, to avoid
confusion with
Hi all
I had various discussions around execution of Servlet API Filters in the Sling
Engine.
To recap: Currently all filters are always called. The service.ranking (or
filter.order) service registration property can be used to define the order in
which the filters are called and the
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
... * filter.resourceType: The Filter is only called if the resourceType
of the current Resource (SlingHttpServletRequest.getResource)
matches any of the given resource types...
I've long been
big and fat +1 from me :)
regards
antonio
On Aug 18, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi all
I had various discussions around execution of Servlet API Filters in the
Sling Engine.
To recap: Currently all filters are always called. The service.ranking (or
Hi Felix,
I think to reduce the unexpected you'd need filter.resourceType to match
on the resource's supertype hierarchy too.
Cheers,
Jeff.
On 18/08/2014 10:23, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi all
I had various discussions around execution of Servlet API Filters in the
Sling
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jeff Young j...@adobe.com wrote:
...I think to reduce the unexpected you'd need filter.resourceType to match
on the resource's supertype hierarchy too...
Which is where reusing the existing script resolution logic would
help, instead of reimplementing.
Hmm, org.apache.tika.mime;resolution:=optional;version=[1.0,2)
2014-08-17 19:24 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz apa...@oliverlietz.de:
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 08:37:18 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
in order to get Launchpad 7 out, this is a vote to release
Commons Mime 2.1.6
Hi
Am 18.08.2014 um 12:08 schrieb Jeff Young j...@adobe.com:
Hi Felix,
I think to reduce the unexpected you'd need filter.resourceType to match
on the resource's supertype hierarchy too.
Yeah, match could be ResourceUtil.isA(). But it should not be adding to much
overhead for the request
Hi
I am not sure, whether we should go down that route.
A filter ist something which is a cross-cutting concern that the application
places on the request processing. As such it is transparent to the client and
it should not be client adressable. Otherwise unexpected behaviour is
guaranteed.
Do we really really need this? At least path based filtering can be done
with plain servlet filters already.
What are the use cases for this?
Carsten
2014-08-18 13:07 GMT+02:00 Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com:
Hi
I am not sure, whether we should go down that route.
A filter ist
The vote passes with three binding +1 votes from Stefan Egli, Carsten
Ziegeler, and Robert Munteanu.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-3247.
---
ClassCastException may be thrown if Session is not a JackrabbitSession
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-3245.
---
TenantAdapterFactory can return incorrect 'null' tenants depending on order
of pathMatchers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-3376.
---
TenantProvider passes tenant with old state to TenantCustomizer
Oliver, could you please revert your -1? Tika is not required and the
bundle runs without it, the Tika provider does not run, but that's
expected - and I think this has already been the case for 2.1.4. So no new
requirements for this bundle.
Thanks
Carsten
2014-08-18 12:44 GMT+02:00 Carsten
Hi,
Is configuration part of application content or system content or both?
I can see that in a clustered environment you might want to have
configuration shared centrally amongst many versions of the running
application, but you might also need configuration local to a running
version, so that
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
...
Is configuration part of application content or system content or both?
...
We probably need a more fine-grained definition for configs - for now
I see the following types of configuration:
a) Global system-level config,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14100694#comment-14100694
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-3848:
-
I've applied the api patch in rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14100727#comment-14100727
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-3848:
--
One noticeable improvement in the
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.8/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/41/
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.8/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.paxexam.util/41/
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.8/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14100743#comment-14100743
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-3848:
-
Thanks Felix, I'll add this to the
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Dominik Süß dominik.su...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Felix,
you probably remember our discussion - I checked and found out that
resourceresolution is done with adminsession anyways and superTypeHierarchy
being cached (at least from what I remember) therefore
looking at this it seems the same functionality would be handy for
feature flags, no?
Ruben
On 8/18/2014 6:19 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
...
Is configuration part of application content or system content or both?
...
Hi Carsten,
I've played around with filters a lot and the problem with them really is
that they often have way to much impact and are not constrainted as they
would need to be. Even those filters skipping often create a lot of
overhead because they do not skip fast and with cheap evaluations but
Hi Justin,
I'm not talking about global disable because the filter often is extremely
necessary but to be able to disable it for dedicated cases. I just remember
some obscure ColumnControlFilter only checking for the Pathending colctrl
and autorewriting the node underneath. Turning off that filter
Well, so the main argument is badly written code?
2014-08-18 19:35 GMT+02:00 Dominik Süß dominik.su...@gmail.com:
Hi Carsten,
I've played around with filters a lot and the problem with them really is
that they often have way to much impact and are not constrainted as they
would need to be.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14101244#comment-14101244
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-3848:
-
Thanks for your patch to the jcr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14101298#comment-14101298
]
Rob Ryan commented on SLING-3848:
-
[~cziegeler] Thanks for the quick action.
WRT your
On Monday 18 August 2014 13:38:15 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Oliver, could you please revert your -1? Tika is not required and the
bundle runs without it, the Tika provider does not run, but that's
expected - and I think this has already been the case for 2.1.4. So no new
requirements for this
On Monday 18 August 2014 23:21:44 Oliver Lietz wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2014 13:38:15 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Oliver, could you please revert your -1? Tika is not required and the
bundle runs without it, the Tika provider does not run, but that's
expected - and I think this has already
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.8/42/
--
[...truncated 226 lines...]
at
org.tmatesoft.svn.core.internal.util.SVNSocketFactory.createPlainSocket(SVNSocketFactory.java:73)
at
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/2379/
--
[...truncated 211 lines...]
Caused by: svn: E175002: timed out waiting for server
at
org.tmatesoft.svn.core.SVNErrorMessage.create(SVNErrorMessage.java:208)
at
I agree that the current way is not nice, but I think it's nothing which
should block the release.
Anyone else who wants to vote?
Regards
Carsten
2014-08-18 23:44 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz apa...@oliverlietz.de:
On Monday 18 August 2014 23:21:44 Oliver Lietz wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2014
36 matches
Mail list logo
