[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325293#comment-15325293
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5777:
-
Bootstrap ITs are successful on Jenkins also.
> Stop embedding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325283#comment-15325283
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5520:
-
That doesn't look nice, but as long the repository shuts down
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325234#comment-15325234
]
Oliver Lietz edited comment on SLING-5511 at 6/10/16 8:30 PM:
--
[~rombert], I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz resolved SLING-5511.
-
Resolution: Done
> Adjust Oak package imports
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325234#comment-15325234
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5511:
-
[~rombert], I didn't encounter any issues related to package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz reassigned SLING-5511:
---
Assignee: Oliver Lietz
> Adjust Oak package imports
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325198#comment-15325198
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5777:
-
[~rombert], Bootstrap ITs are successful here:
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz closed SLING-5780.
---
> Remove org.apache.sling.auth.openid from build
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz resolved SLING-5780.
-
Resolution: Done
[r1747788|https://svn.apache.org/r1747788]
> Remove
Oliver Lietz created SLING-5780:
---
Summary: Remove org.apache.sling.auth.openid from build
Key: SLING-5780
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5780
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz updated SLING-5776:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Update to Oak 1.5.3
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325108#comment-15325108
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5776:
-
Looks good, [~rombert]. Thanks. Test added for bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Lietz updated SLING-5776:
Fix Version/s: Launchpad Builder 9
Launchpad Karaf Integration Tests 0.2.0
On Friday 10 June 2016 14:51:43 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Robert,
> We have a couple of scripts in the root folder:
>
> - modules.py
> - update_dependencies.sh
- check_release_matches_tag.sh
- check_staged_release.sh
>
> As they are not frequently used, I suggest we move them to
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu updated SLING-5779:
---
Summary: LuceneIndexProviderService is sometimes not configured (was:
Robert Munteanu created SLING-5779:
--
Summary: LuceneIndexProviderService sometimes is not configured
Key: SLING-5779
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5779
Project: Sling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu updated SLING-5779:
---
Attachment: stdout.log.gz
error.log.gz
> LuceneIndexProviderService is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu resolved SLING-5778.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in [r1747733|https://svn.apache.org/r1747733]
>
I am talking about
https://github.com/apache/sling/blob/c9e59667d8f9cd698bc33a51f3e6a22e85d4a952/bundles/scripting/sightly/engine/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/scripting/sightly/impl/engine/extension/ResourceRuntimeExtension.java#L254
Robert Munteanu created SLING-5778:
--
Summary: o.a.s.repoinit.oak-jcr does not start due to missing
org.apache.sling.provisioning.model package
Key: SLING-5778
URL:
I only propose to change getParent() on NonExistingResource. Right now we have
the situation that getParent() would just return the wrong NonExistingResource!
So what we could do is to rely on resolve() as a fallback in case the regular
way does not succeed. That would not make things any worse
Regardless of what other problem may exist; involving resolve() in
getParent() isn't a solution.
Resolve() operates on _URI_ paths. Not on resource paths. So proposing to
involve resolve() in an implementation of getParent() doesn't make sense.
Resolve() makes special considerations of some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324499#comment-15324499
]
Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-5520:
[~olli] - the Repository is still reconfigured/restarted
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu resolved SLING-5777.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in [r1747710|https://svn.apache.org/r1747710]
[~olli] - I updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324330#comment-15324330
]
Konrad Windszus edited comment on SLING-5770 at 6/10/16 1:46 PM:
-
For that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324375#comment-15324375
]
Robert Munteanu edited comment on SLING-5520 at 6/10/16 1:44 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324466#comment-15324466
]
Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-5520:
I am not sure about that, but I can try later :-) and
+1
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:24 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
+1
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324375#comment-15324375
]
Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-5520:
{quote}There is still use of deprecated Oak API in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324373#comment-15324373
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5520:
-
Do we still need start levels for setting up Oak properly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324371#comment-15324371
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-5520:
-
There is still use of deprecated Oak API in
Hi,
We solved issues in this releases:
Apache Sling Testing JCR Mock 1.1.14 (2 issues)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12334801
Apache Sling Testing OSGi Mock 2.0.4 (2 issues)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12334799
Apache Sling Testing
Hi,
Right now we have the oak glue code located in bundles/jcr/jackrabbit-
oak and the ITs for the oak integration located in bundles/jcr/it-
jackrabbit-oak.
This makes updating Oak a bit harder since:
- you have to update the oak version in both the bundles and the ITs
- you have to build and
Robert Munteanu created SLING-5777:
--
Summary: Stop embedding oak-jcr in the o.a.s.jcr.oak.server bundle
Key: SLING-5777
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5777
Project: Sling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324350#comment-15324350
]
Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-5511:
[~olli] - is there anything left to be done here?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu resolved SLING-5776.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in [r1747690|https://svn.apache.org/r1747690]:
-
Robert Munteanu created SLING-5776:
--
Summary: Update to Oak 1.5.3
Key: SLING-5776
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5776
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Perfect, thanks.
Konrad
> On 10 Jun 2016, at 13:48, Stefan Seifert wrote:
>
> i will do the release as i want to release some of the other mock libs as
> well today.
>
> stefan
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Konrad Windszus [mailto:konra...@gmx.de]
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seifert updated SLING-5478:
--
Assignee: (was: Stefan Seifert)
Fix Version/s: (was: Testing JCR Mock 1.1.14)
Hi,
We have a couple of scripts in the root folder:
- modules.py
- update_dependencies.sh
As they are not frequently used, I suggest we move them to
'tooling/release' or maybe 'tooling/scm' if appropriate.
Also, I'm not sure how to use update_dependencies.sh, there are no docs
for it and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324330#comment-15324330
]
Konrad Windszus commented on SLING-5770:
For that I need to implement my own custom context, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324329#comment-15324329
]
Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-5520:
[~olli] - any more changes to be done here? I'd like to
i will do the release as i want to release some of the other mock libs as well
today.
stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: Konrad Windszus [mailto:konra...@gmx.de]
>Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 10:18 AM
>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>Subject: Release of Testing ResourceResolverMock
>
>I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324319#comment-15324319
]
Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-5770:
---
if you do the same as in AemContextImpl and overwrite the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seifert resolved SLING-5775.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 1747678
> jcr-mock: Support PropertyDefinition
Stefan Seifert created SLING-5775:
-
Summary: jcr-mock: Support PropertyDefinition flags
Key: SLING-5775
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5775
Project: Sling
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seifert resolved SLING-5774.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 1747677
> jcr-mock: Support
Stefan Seifert created SLING-5774:
-
Summary: jcr-mock: Support Node.getMixinNodeTypes
Key: SLING-5774
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5774
Project: Sling
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324173#comment-15324173
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SLING-5629:
---
Github user glucazeau closed the pull request at:
Github user glucazeau closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/sling/pull/132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15324161#comment-15324161
]
Radu Cotescu commented on SLING-5461:
-
Please open a separate issue (as this one is closed) and try to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-5738.
---
> Add support for configuring a pattern for the model files to be read
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-5765.
---
> No way to remove an artifact from a special runmode
>
The vote passes with three binding +1 votes
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org
Konrad Windszus wrote
> My use case is AEM:
> I have an existing page containing some components (each one encapsulated in
> dedicated child resources).
> Now the underlying template in AEM is extended (i.e. new fixed components
> have been added). For each of those a child resource is
Hi Robert,
That's a unit test for the sling http testing clients themselves and I only
made that change to test my svn rights :)
But thanks for pointing that out, I'll make sure to use the
timeoutsprovider wherever there's a sleep in the tooling.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:53 PM Robert
My use case is AEM:
I have an existing page containing some components (each one encapsulated in
dedicated child resources).
Now the underlying template in AEM is extended (i.e. new fixed components have
been added). For each of those a child resource is necessary, which does not
exist yet on
On 10.6.16 9:26 , Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
I think calling resolve() for traversal is totally unexpected. Now
looking at this, I'm really wondering if it was a good idea to implement
getParent on NonExistingResource. Let the client deal with it instead of
adding complex special cases.
FWIW:
Konrad Windszus wrote
> This is complex to solve for the client (and kind of unexpected that this is
> not working).
> So what speaks against supporting this use case properly in Sling.
> Maybe you can elaborate a bit on
>> I think calling resolve() for traversal is totally unexpected.
>
> IMHO
This is complex to solve for the client (and kind of unexpected that this is
not working).
So what speaks against supporting this use case properly in Sling.
Maybe you can elaborate a bit on
> I think calling resolve() for traversal is totally unexpected.
IMHO the complex cases should be nicely
I think calling resolve() for traversal is totally unexpected. Now
looking at this, I'm really wondering if it was a good idea to implement
getParent on NonExistingResource. Let the client deal with it instead of
adding complex special cases.
Carsten
Konrad Windszus wrote
> There is one related
Konrad Windszus created SLING-5773:
--
Summary: NonExistingResource.getParent() must consider the
resource resolver mapping
Key: SLING-5773
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5773
There is one related problem with mapping:
Consider the case you have a resource resolver mapping from "/content/" to "/".
In the underlying repository you have a resource in "/content/existingParent".
Now it might happen that a NonExistingResource is resolved for path
65 matches
Mail list logo