[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-8485.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Feature Launcher should keep order of features
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862734#comment-16862734
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8485:
-
Added an additional fix in e65f12d to keep the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler reopened SLING-8485:
-
> Feature Launcher should keep order of features
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Pauls resolved SLING-8485.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done in 3c7c413..9c1494a
> Feature Launcher should keep order of features
>
Dan Klco created SLING-8486:
---
Summary: Insights Broken with New Sling Engine
Key: SLING-8486
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8486
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
Karl Pauls created SLING-8485:
-
Summary: Feature Launcher should keep order of features
Key: SLING-8485
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8485
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Bug
paul-bjorkstrand opened a new pull request #1: Allow an adaptable argument
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-scripting-sightly-models-provider/pull/1
Allows for the argument `adaptable` to be specified in the use-block, to
force the sling model creation to use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862368#comment-16862368
]
Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-7935:
-
[~rombert], can we please switch back to individual versions
Hi
For now the Content Package Converter worked for me to get a CP based project
converted into a FM based Sling instance.
That said for the future I am wondering where the CP Converter is heading to.
As far as I understand the FM idea is to re-create a Sling instance on every
deployment and
rombert opened a new pull request #35: Added support for okhttp
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-whiteboard/pull/35
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
I kind of missed those steps as well in the past. I thought that this would be
automatically done as soon as you push something to dist.
Can we aim for a better automation here?
Also from the script
https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/blob/master/update_reporter.sh
rombert merged pull request #34: URL connection agent cleanups
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-whiteboard/pull/34
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Hi Robert,
Assuming the latest report was published on March 20th 2019 [0], then the
following releases may need to be included.
- Testing Sling Mock Oak 2.1.6
- Webconsole Security Provider 1.2.2
- Sling Maven Plugin 2.4.2
- Testing PaxExam 3.0.0
- Sling Default POST Servlets 2.3.30
- Sling
bosschaert commented on issue #12: SLING-8484 Fail the launcher if not all
bundles could be launched
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-launcher/pull/12#issuecomment-501286863
As discussed on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484 we are not
doing
bosschaert closed pull request #12: SLING-8484 Fail the launcher if not all
bundles could be launched
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-launcher/pull/12
This is an automated message from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Bosschaert resolved SLING-8484.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Ok - won't fix then. :)
> Fail the launcher if not all bundles
Hi Timothee,
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 15:30 +0200, Timothee Maret wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I am not sure if this is expected or even relevant but the list of
> releases
> does not seem to include all the items from
> https://sling.apache.org/releases.html
We should include all releases in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862104#comment-16862104
]
Carsten Ziegeler edited comment on SLING-8484 at 6/12/19 1:37 PM:
--
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862104#comment-16862104
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8484:
-
I wouldn't recommend launching anything without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862104#comment-16862104
]
Carsten Ziegeler edited comment on SLING-8484 at 6/12/19 1:35 PM:
--
I
Hi Robert,
I am not sure if this is expected or even relevant but the list of releases
does not seem to include all the items from
https://sling.apache.org/releases.html
Regards,
Timothee
Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 09:56, Robert Munteanu a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Please find the draft board report
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862091#comment-16862091
]
David Bosschaert commented on SLING-8484:
-
{quote}
but what situations does the analyzer and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862036#comment-16862036
]
Karl Pauls commented on SLING-8484:
---
framework start will wait until the beginning startlevel is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862039#comment-16862039
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8484:
-
but what situations does the analyzer *and* the system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862033#comment-16862033
]
David Bosschaert commented on SLING-8484:
-
I could be wrong, but looking at the documentation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862012#comment-16862012
]
Carsten Ziegeler edited comment on SLING-8484 at 6/12/19 11:39 AM:
---
I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862007#comment-16862007
]
David Bosschaert edited comment on SLING-8484 at 6/12/19 11:22 AM:
---
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862012#comment-16862012
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8484:
-
I'm wondering if this works - I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862007#comment-16862007
]
David Bosschaert edited comment on SLING-8484 at 6/12/19 11:21 AM:
---
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16862007#comment-16862007
]
David Bosschaert commented on SLING-8484:
-
My initial implementation checks that after
bosschaert opened a new pull request #12: SLING-8484 Fail the launcher if not
all bundles could be launched
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-launcher/pull/12
This is an automated message from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861994#comment-16861994
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8484:
-
My understanding of this issue is that the launcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861988#comment-16861988
]
Karl Pauls commented on SLING-8484:
---
The important thing for me is that it should be optional as I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861956#comment-16861956
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8484:
-
Why should it not be the default?
> Fail the launcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861954#comment-16861954
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-8481:
-
I'm not really worried about the size.
Your point
David Bosschaert created SLING-8484:
---
Summary: Fail the launcher if not all bundles could be launched
Key: SLING-8484
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8484
Project: Sling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861945#comment-16861945
]
David Bosschaert commented on SLING-8481:
-
On using extensions to record this extra data. I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861945#comment-16861945
]
David Bosschaert edited comment on SLING-8481 at 6/12/19 9:39 AM:
--
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861867#comment-16861867
]
Simone Tripodi commented on SLING-8251:
---
{{slingfeature-maven-plugin}} integration added in
Hi,
Please find the draft board report below. I plan to submit it this
afternoon (CEST), comments welcome.
Thanks,
Robert
## Description:
Apache Sling™ is a framework for RESTful web-applications based on an
extensible content tree.
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board
Yes, I think that should be enough.
Thanks,
Robert
On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 09:38 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Ups, it seems I just send it to Timothee and not the list :(
>
>
> Attached is my mail I send, I hope that solves the issue
>
>
> Regards
>
> Carsten
>
>
> Robert Munteanu
Ups, it seems I just send it to Timothee and not the list :(
Attached is my mail I send, I hope that solves the issue
Regards
Carsten
Robert Munteanu wrote
Hi Timothee,
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 09:54 +0200, Timothee Maret wrote:
+1 (binding): Daniel Klco, Carsten Ziegeler, Stefan Seifert
Hi Timothee,
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 09:54 +0200, Timothee Maret wrote:
> +1 (binding): Daniel Klco, Carsten Ziegeler, Stefan Seifert
I do not see an email from Carsten voting for this release, neither in
my email client nor at [1].
Robert
[1]:
43 matches
Mail list logo