[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428458#comment-17428458
]
Eric Norman edited comment on SLING-10740 at 10/13/21, 7:32 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428458#comment-17428458
]
Eric Norman edited comment on SLING-10740 at 10/13/21, 7:32 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428458#comment-17428458
]
Eric Norman commented on SLING-10740:
-
[~angela] Yes, I did notice that the implementation of
rombert commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942154903
I think it's worthwhile to add a simplistic gate in the feature model
analysers as we can't guarantee that everyone is producing content packages
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941021444
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942334904
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #31:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-launcher/pull/31#issuecomment-941140482
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! ![Quality Gate
cschneider commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941973180
@kwin The current version of filevault-package-maven-plugin fully supports
this. Unfortunately we have no influence on if / when our customers
kwin edited a comment on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942158507
IMHO having validators on content packages inside a Sling Feature Analyzer
is questionable. FileVault provides both tooling and API for exactly
kwin commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941982304
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942334904
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. ![Quality Gate
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942367153
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. ![Quality Gate
kwin edited a comment on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942158507
IMHO having validators on content packages inside a Sling Feature Analyzer
is questionable. FileVault provides both tooling and API for exactly
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941021444
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. ![Quality Gate
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942334904
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. ![Quality Gate
Please see
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Sling/job/modules/job/sling-org-apache-sling-launchpad-testing/job/master/703/
for details.
No further emails will be sent until the status of the build is changed.
kwin commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942158507
IMHO having validators on content packages inside a Sling Feature Analyzer
is questionable. FileVault provides both tooling and API for exactly that
rombert commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-942154903
I think it's worthwhile to add a simplistic gate in the feature model
analysers as we can't guarantee that everyone is producing content packages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428122#comment-17428122
]
Angela Schreiber commented on SLING-10740:
--
[~bdelacretaz], i must have misread it. thanks for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428063#comment-17428063
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-10740:
-
bq. ...the proposal outlined by Bertrand
Hi Robert,
Am Di., 12. Okt. 2021 um 09:35 Uhr schrieb Robert Munteanu <
romb...@apache.org>:
>
>
> Is the basic need to only know when the resource resolver is going to
> be closed in order to flush the cache?
>
That is not my concern at all. In that case I would require the value to be
a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17428053#comment-17428053
]
Angela Schreiber commented on SLING-10740:
--
[~enorman], the reason why lookup for transient
kwin commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941982304
I don't know how you run the analyzer internally, but as I said the
maven-plugin supports validating content package artifacts (without having
access
cschneider commented on pull request #32:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-feature-analyser/pull/32#issuecomment-941973180
@kwin The current version of filevault-package-maven-plugin fully supports
this. Unfortunately we have no influence on if / when our customers
24 matches
Mail list logo
