+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 3:34 PM
To: Sling Developers
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Scheduler 2.4.6
Hi,
We solved 1 issue in this release:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Seifert [mailto:sseif...@pro-vision.de]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:23 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Testing Resource Resolver Mock version
0.3.0
Hi,
We solved 4 issues in this
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Robert Munteanu, Carsten Ziegeler, Mike Müller
I will copy this release to the Sling dist directory and
promote the artifacts to the central Maven repository.
Best regards
mike
Hi,
It's time to make a first release of the Resource Access Security bundle.
There's a lot of test coverage and the feature set includes access controlling
on all CRUD
operations.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-1122/
You can use this
+1
-Original Message-
From: Mike Müller [mailto:mike...@mysign.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:19 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Resource Access Security version 1.0.0
Hi,
It's time to make a first release of the Resource Access
+1 best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 3:23 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Auth Core 1.3.0
Hi,
We solved two issue:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:34 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling DavEx Access to repositories 1.2.2
Hi,
We solved 1 issue in this release:
Welcome on board Stefan!
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Seifert [mailto:sseif...@pro-vision.de]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:21 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANN] New Apache Sling Committer: Stefan Seifert
thank you very much!
a few
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:33 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling API 2.8.0, take II
Hi,
We solved 3 issues
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 5:30 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling JSON Library 2.0.8
Hi,
On the road for the Sling 7 release ...
We solved 3 issues in
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 6:35 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Default POST Servlets 2.3.6
Hi,
We solved 1 issue in this release:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 2:26 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Sling Auth Modules
Hi,
in order to get Launchpad 7 out, this is a vote to release
Auth Core 1.1.8
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:54 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Parent version 20
Hi,
We solved 3 issues in this release:
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 9:22 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Launchpad 7 Release?
I've updated the bundle list - it was pretty current. For three bundles we
still have open issues before we can
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 15:30 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Looking at the snapshot list of the builder project, I guess we could
just
release all of them and we're got with Sling 7 and then maybe have a
look
at how to change things after Sling 7?
+1, I think it's important to
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 1:51 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Scripting JSP 2.1.2 and Apache Sling
Scripting
Java 2.0.8
Hi,
We solved two
Hi
Just my 2 cents to it:
Why not defining a featureflag-interface which is internally implemented
with ResourceAccessGates. Personally I think ResourceAccessGates could do
the job but I can follow the fear, that such a mechanism mixing up with a
security mechanism could lead to bad design. So
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 4:38 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Service User Mapper 1.0.2
Hi,
We solved 1 issue in this release:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Chetan Mehrotra [mailto:chetan.mehro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:38 AM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Classloader Leak Detector 1.0.0
Hi,
This is to vote for the Apache Sling Classloader Leak Detector
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:20 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Scripting JSP 2.1.0 and Apache Sling
Commons Compiler 2.2.0
Hi,
this vote is about
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 10:55 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Bundle Archetype 1.0.2
Hi,
We solved 5 issues in this release:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munteanu [mailto:romb...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:03 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Servlet Archetype 1.0.2
Hi,
We solved 9 issues in this release:
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:03 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Servlets Resolver 2.3.2
Anyone else?
2014-03-24 20:26 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:03 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Factory Configuration
1.0.12
Anyone else?
2014-03-24 10:56
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:04 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Servlets Get 2.1.8
Anyone else?
2014-03-24 20:26 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:04 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Parent POM 19
Anyone else?
2014-03-24 14:33 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 2:25 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Resource Resolver 1.1.0
Hi,
We solved 17 issues in this release:
2014-03-17 8:38 GMT-07:00 Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch:
Hi
I think this is insecure by design and not correct:
The problem is not, that we do grant access if no ResourceAccessGate is
registered for application context. The problem is, that we grant access
also
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: [RT] Make ResourceAccessSecurity always restrict access if
installed and no ResourceAccessGate present
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
... Maybe it would make sense to rename
...snipsnap
Ok, I see your point and yes, partially this is related to the name
DONTCARE. I'm fine with renaming it to CANTDECIDE and then implementing
it the way you suggest :)
Regards
Carsten
Okay, created SLING-3462.
Best regards
mike
Hi
As I worked on SLING-3435 [1] and added some more tests I noticed that
Even if resourceaccesssecurity is installed as a bundle the two implementing
classes ApplicationResourceAccessSecurityImpl (for application context) and
ProviderResourceAccessSecurityImpl (for provider context) are only
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 2:39 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Engine 2.3.2
Hi,
this vote is about the release of
Apache Sling Engine 2.3.2
+1
Checked sigantures
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 11:37 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Resource Merger 1.0.0
Hi,
this vote is about the first
+1
Checked sigantures
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 1:40 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Servlets Resolver 2.3.0
Hi,
this vote is about the release of
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:45 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Sling Event 3.3.4
Hi,
I just discovery a regression bug in the eventing (SLING-3329). Therefore I
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:15 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Event 3.3.2
Hi,
its time for a new Sling event release.
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:56 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Installer Core 3.5.0
Hi,
its time for a new installer core release.
Hi
In the hope not to raise dust again...
ResourceAccessGate could really help to harden existing Sling applications
even if they use JCR only as backend. As mentioned many times before
ResourceAccessGate does not interfere or cancel other ACLs like these from
JCR and it is not a substitution of
Although this seems to be another compromise, it has advantages to
the actual flag which must be set on every provider. Sorry to say it
again, but no configuration would be easier and logical. The writer
of the ResourceAccessGate can decide anyway on which Resource he
will apply rules or not.
...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:12 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Reconsidering when to apply resource access security
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
...I think if
someone like to use ResourceAccessGate it should be as easy
+1
That would be more consistent.
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 2:24 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Reconsidering when to apply resource access security
Hi,
after long discussions
Hi
I'm not sure if it is a good idea that a ResourceDecorator could
return null. IMHO it's not what someone would expect from a
Decorator. All the more that decorator is the name of a well known
pattern, which would never be a null object (only a null object could
be decorated but not vice
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Egli [mailto:e...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:03 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling discovery.impl 1.0.2
Hi Ian,
It should be there now.
(It was 'in the pipeline
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 5:28 PM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling org.apache.sling.commons.testing 2.0.16
Hi,
We solved 5 issues in this release:
To confirm what Dominik mentioned:
The existing ResourceAccessGate would allow to grant or deny access
to resources. IMHO there's no need to implement another interface or
hook to achieve what is requested in the perspective of granting or denying
access to resources based on feature flag. Just
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Felix Meschberger
fmesc...@adobe.comwrote:
Hi
Sure you can do it, but it (a) doesn’t match the idea of an access gate
(at least not in my little brain cells) and (b) it is not comprehensive
since the JCR Resource Provider does not leverage that. (b)
A warm welcome to the Sling committer team!
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 9:41 AM
To: dev
Subject: [ANN] please welcome Chetan Mehrotra as a Sling committer!
Hi,
Based on his
1+
sorry for being late...
best regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:30 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Web Console Security Provider 1.1.0
Anyone else?
Thanks
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 4:16 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Commons Scheduler 2.4.2, Commons Threads
3.2.0, and Evenint 3.3.0
Hi,
it's time
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 4:18 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Health Check Core 1.0.6, Health Check
JMX 1.0.6, and JMX Resource Provider 0.6.0
Hi,
+1, cool tools ;-)
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 5:39 PM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] Initial Release of the Apache Sling Health Check Tools
Hi,
This is a vote for the initial release
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 10:00 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Drop the time zone info from committers page
+1
Regards
Felix
Am 17.09.2013 um 19:33 schrieb
+1 for releasing it as 1.0.0 as the API seems tob e pretty stable.
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 4:04 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] move healthcheck under
Hi
The common way to solve such an access control for a provider like
the Cassandra resource provider is the new ResourceAccessSecurity
service. This is implemented in the bundle resourceaccesssecurity
(at this time only read rights will be checked). All you have to do is to
implement the SPI
From: ianbos...@gmail.com [mailto:ianbos...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ian Boston
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the pointer.
On 12 September 2013 14:58, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
Hi
The common way to solve such an access control for a provider like
the Cassandra resource provider
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 8:20 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Parent POM 18
Hi,
please vote for a release of our parent pom, it basically contains updates
of the
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 10:11 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Commons Log 3.0.2
Hi
This is to vote for the Apache Commons Log 3.0.2 release. This is probably
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 9:52 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Discovery Modules, Settings and Eventing
Hi,
this vote is primarily about doing the first release
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:06 PM
To: dev
Subject: [VOTE] release org.apache.sling.auth.form version 1.0.4
Hi,
We solved 3 issues in this release:
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 12:51 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] JCR Resource 2.2.8 and Servlets Post 2.3.0
Hi,
we have some important bug fixes and improvements to release.
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:58 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release parent 16
Please vote for the release of a new parent pom. This contains a single
change, the
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:16 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release API 2.4.2
Hi,
I just fixed two errors in ResourceUtil (SLING-2844 and SLING-2845) which
imho
Welcome and congrats Stefan!
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:57 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [ANN] New Committer : Stefan Egli
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
Welcome and congrats Dan!
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:03 AM
To: dev
Subject: [ANN] Please welcome Dan Klco as a Sling committer
Hi,
Based on his ongoing and valuable
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:14 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Security 1.0.4
Hi,
this vote is about a fix in the security module (SLING-2836)
So
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 8:14 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Testing ResourceResolver Mock 0.1.0
Hi,
this vote is about a first release of our new Testing
AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on the current ResourceAccessSecurity API
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
...I commited a last shot of the SPI API. The Sling API hasn't changed
anymore. I think the API is now complete
I commited a last shot of the SPI API. The Sling API hasn't changed
anymore. I think the API is now complete and after all the discussions
enough mature.
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:48 PM
It's not really an optimization in the sense of a QueryOptimizer, that
could be
done
by every ResourceProvider by now, without any new API. The sanitizeQuery
functionality
has to come with the ResourceAccessSecurity service: The query can be
injected
(sanitized) only from a service
So it is optimizeQuery really ;-)
-Bertrand
optimizeQuery in matters of performant security checks :-)
Maybe you are right in this case, that we rather should name the method
optimizeQuery than sanitizeQuery.
mike
+1
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 5:53 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: Feedback on the current ResourceAccessSecurity API
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
Notes on ResourceAccessSecurity:
1) javadocs says * - Expected to only be implemented once in the
framework/application..., I'm not sure about that. If you have both a
filesystem and an HBase resource providers, they might use very
different implementations?
2) Notes as comments in the
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:10 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] ResourceAccessSecurity service for ResourceProvider without
ACLs
2013/3/24 Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch:
From: Carsten
Hi
I'm coming up with a new thread concerning the use of the new
ResourceAccessSecurity service in implementations of ResourceProvider
which do not have uderlaying ACLs.
My first thought was that each ResourceProvider without any ACLs should
implement some lightweight access security through the
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Okay, as far as I understand we've got the consensus of separating my
access gate
proposal from the Sling API. We should have something like a
ResourceAccessSecurity
service in a extension bundle,
I think we can keep the basic
Hi
To be sure (and save some time coding ;-) ), I sum up our discussion:
We can keep the basic singleton service (ResourceAccessSecurity) in the API
and document it like this:
* Expected to only be implemented once in the framework/application
(much like the OSGi LogService or
Hi
Okay, as far as I understand we've got the consensus of separating my access
gate
proposal from the Sling API. We should have something like a
ResourceAccessSecurity
service in a extension bundle, I think we don't loose the goal of bringing Sling
forward to a frontend of resources from
Sorry for asking a stupid question, but why would a ResourceProvider
that delivered resources subject to security, not implement it that
security and cover the use cases required as a part of its
implementation ?
1 Allowing insecure ResourceProviders to exist with the intention of
Just to throw in some more ideas :) what about a decorator for
resource providers? This would also solve the use case of easily
adding additional checks to resource providers who don't have their
own access checks without needing to code this into each and every
provider.
And a
Many modern stores do not provide any security, they're just stupid
key-value or column stores.
How about being able to promote Sling + HBase as a scalable web
framework, for example? How about Sling as web layer for Solr?
That would be very cool IMO, and if you want ACLs in such a setup
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
...A ResourceProviderDecorator couldn't do the job, because some operations
are on the ResourceResolver at the moment (delete, create but also
findResources
and queryResources)
Does that indicate that those
2013/3/6 Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch:
Just to throw in some more ideas :) what about a decorator for
resource providers? This would also solve the use case of easily
adding additional checks to resource providers who don't have their
own access checks without needing to code
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:28 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Sling Launchpad Base 2.5.0 and Apache Sling Scripting
Console 1.0.0
Hi,
this vote is about a
+1
Best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 5:48 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Drop Java 5 Support in General
Hi,
we see more and more problems with supporting Java 5 and we
+1
best regards
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 4:16 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Five New Releases
Hi,
This vote is about five new releases
Parent 14
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 3:17 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Sling Servlet Resolver 2.2.2
Hi
I would like to call a vote on the Sling Servlet Resolver
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:32 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons OSGi, Settings, Rewriter, Launchpad Installer
and Maven Launchpad Plugin
Hi,
This vote
+1
proved the signatures...
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:27 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] New API and related bundles
Hi,
This vote is about ten modules in total
Hi
The integration tests now fail, because the SortingServiceTracker could not be
found in the released version of commons/osgi.
Am I correct, that the only way to correct this is to release Commons OSGi
bundle in 2.1.2.
Or are there any alternative ways to make the tests run again?
best
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
...The integration tests now fail, because the SortingServiceTracker could
not be
found in the released version of commons/osgi.
Am I correct, that the only way to correct this is to release Commons OSGi
bundle
I haven't followed all the changes, but so far the installer did
inline the classes from OSGi commons. Maybe this new class needs to be
added to be inlined?
Carsten
2012/11/2 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote
Carsten, looked at the wrong thing... ;-)
best regards
mike
2012/11/2 Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch:
I haven't followed all the changes, but so far the installer did
inline the classes from OSGi commons. Maybe this new class needs to be
added to be inlined?
Carsten
2012/11/2 Bertrand
if someone implements a ResourceAccessGateService. The
proposal
only suggest a new service interface which can be implemented by a user of
sling or not.
In the case of not using this service, nothing changes from an API-view.
On 26.10.2012, at 10:43, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
Okay
Hi
The main goal of this proposal is to provide a easy to use service in
Sling to restrict (or grant) access to resources for special use cases
(like giving access to some resources only between 8am and 5pm). The
service should be very lightweight and should NOT be a replacement of ACLs
- and of
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:46 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Scripting JST 2.0.6
Hi,
This vote is the release of Apache Sling Scripting JST 2.0.6 which
fixes
Hi,
I'm currently working on CRUD support for Sling based on the resource
API. Current trunk contains already a version of it.
I'm wondering what the best api for modifying resources is.
Right now, the idea is to adapt a resource to ModifiableValueMap which
is an extension of the
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:54 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RT] API for modifying resources
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Mike Müller mike...@mysign.ch wrote:
...that's what I meant
A little bit late...
I find it quite natural to first set the changes with put and remove and
after that call update to make the changes persistent. That's very similar
to how OR mappers or also JCR with the session works.
But if I get you right, after the call of update on the
Hi
A little bit late...
I find it quite natural to first set the changes with put and remove and
after that call update to make the changes persistent. That's very similar
to how OR mappers or also JCR with the session works.
But if I get you right, after the call of update on the
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:13 PM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] New Releases
Hi,
This vote is about seven new releases where each release contains an
important fix.
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
