Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-11-01 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Robert Munteanu wrote > On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 20:53 +0900, Steven Walters wrote: >> This feels like an "eating your own dog food" scenario, where Sling >> could just switch to using its own developed/maintained commons JSON >> library... >> Or is there something missing from the public

Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-11-01 Thread Robert Munteanu
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 20:53 +0900, Steven Walters wrote: > This feels like an "eating your own dog food" scenario, where Sling > could just switch to using its own developed/maintained commons JSON > library... > Or is there something missing from the public conversation as to why > it's being

Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-10-29 Thread Steven Walters
This feels like an "eating your own dog food" scenario, where Sling could just switch to using its own developed/maintained commons JSON library... Or is there something missing from the public conversation as to why it's being avoided/not mentioned?

Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-10-29 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Oct 28, 2016, at 4:20 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > > Hi > > Yea, johnzon was also mentioned on the Felix Dev list. Like this. > > Regardless of the licensing org.json situation, given that there is > javax.json as a standard API, we should maybe consider anyways to

Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-10-28 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi Yea, johnzon was also mentioned on the Felix Dev list. Like this. Regardless of the licensing org.json situation, given that there is javax.json as a standard API, we should maybe consider anyways to replace our uses of the org.json library with javax.json. As I said, nothing decided yet,

Re: [JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-10-28 Thread Robert Munteanu
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 08:08 +, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all > > Over at legal-discuss there is a discussion of whether the json.org > library with the amended MIT license (remember the „use for good not > evil“ clause ?) should be „banned“ by reconsidering the „A“ rating of > this

[JSON] Replacing json.org

2016-10-28 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi all Over at legal-discuss there is a discussion of whether the json.org library with the amended MIT license (remember the „use for good not evil“ clause ?) should be „banned“ by reconsidering the „A“ rating of this license (assuming the clause is just a joke) and turning it into an „X“