Re: pipes release 0.0.10

Please find issue with patch attached here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6122 > On Oct 5, 2016, at 8:01 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 October 2016 16:13:50 Nicolas Peltier wrote: >> looks like you didn’t push the refactors you were talking

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Wednesday 05 October 2016 16:13:50 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > looks like you didn’t push the refactors you were talking about (moving > things to impl mostly) is a patch on the older version still good? or > would you like me to do the refactor as well? Check out from ASF SVN, looks like

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

looks like you didn’t push the refactors you were talking about (moving things to impl mostly) is a patch on the older version still good? or would you like me to do the refactor as well? > On Oct 4, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 October 2016

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Tuesday 04 October 2016 11:22:06 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > thanks i’ll look into it and fix it. Should i create a JIRA for it? Also > need a few update in documentation as well anyway Yes, please. A new issue for 0.0.10 is fine. O. > Nicolas [...]

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

thanks i’ll look into it and fix it. Should i create a JIRA for it? Also need a few update in documentation as well anyway Nicolas > On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Monday 03 October 2016 08:31:46 Nicolas Peltier wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi Nicolas, >

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Monday 03 October 2016 08:31:46 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > Hi, Hi Nicolas, > not that i can see, thanks. I tried to do the release, but it failed with javadoc errors. You can try yourself with mvn clean javadoc:javadoc. Can you provide a patch (preferred) or we can skip javadoc. Thanks, O.

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

Hi, not that i can see, thanks. Nicolas > On Oct 2, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Friday 30 September 2016 07:48:24 Nicolas Peltier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> +1 this would be clearer indeed > > Done. Anything else? Otherwise I would try to do the release

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Friday 30 September 2016 07:48:24 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > Hi, > > +1 this would be clearer indeed Done. Anything else? Otherwise I would try to do the release tonight. Regards, O. > Thanks, > Nicolas [...]

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

Hi, +1 this would be clearer indeed Thanks, Nicolas > On Sep 29, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Thursday 29 September 2016 18:39:31 Nicolas Peltier wrote: >> Hi Oliver, >> >> fine with me :-) > > Looking closer... I *wonder* if not all pipes but BasePipe,

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Thursday 29 September 2016 18:39:31 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > fine with me :-) Looking closer... I *wonder* if not all pipes but BasePipe, ContainerPipe and ReferencePipe should go to impl. Or are they meant to be extended? Thanks, O. > Nicolas > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 8:37

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

Hi Oliver, fine with me :-) Nicolas > On Sep 29, 2016, at 8:37 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > > On Thursday 29 September 2016 16:23:27 Nicolas Peltier wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi Nicolas, > >> can someone that has time :-S please >> resolve

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Thursday 29 September 2016 16:23:27 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > Hi, Hi Nicolas, > can someone that has time :-S please > resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6073 (patch attached), > and release 0.0.10 that correspond to what was presented at the adaptTo? I've moved

Re: pipes release 0.0.10

On Thursday 29 September 2016 16:23:27 Nicolas Peltier wrote: > Hi, Hi Nicolas, > can someone that has time :-S please > resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6073 (patch attached), > and release 0.0.10 that correspond to what was presented at the adaptTo? I will not receive mails

pipes release 0.0.10

Hi, can someone that has time :-S please resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-6073 (patch attached), and release 0.0.10 that correspond to what was presented at the adaptTo? Thanks a lot! Nicolas