Justin Mason said:
mystery solved ;)
Aww, I was looking forward to tracking down a really mysterious bug :)
-- sidney
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 05:13 ---
I looked at the code on the trunk but the change seemed to overarching for
3.0.x. I'm not sure I understand the context of Daniel's change.
Anyway, just for the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4350
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 05:20 ---
I already left a comment for bug 4338 but just to recap here, I was proposing to
take just Theo's original quick fix for bug 3968#comment 2 instead of the whole
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4338
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 06:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=2892)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2892action=view)
Simple patch
For 3.04, keep it simple. To do it the 3.1
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4351
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 06:12 ---
WIN32 uses code in configure.pl instead of the autoconf stuff, so there has to
be something added there for spamc.h that corresponds to what was added to
Does anyone know if we should be able to use the latest version of
Buildbot, 0.6.5 with buildbot.spamassassin.org? I know that I could just
try it, but I don't want to spend time trying to get it to work only to
find that the master has to be upgraded first.
-- sidney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
Does anyone know if we should be able to use the latest version of
Buildbot, 0.6.5 with buildbot.spamassassin.org? I know that I could just
try it, but I don't want to spend time trying to get it to work only to
find that
Justin Mason said:
yep, should be possible -- create a t/config file that enables it in
the buildbot slave's checkout ;)
I thought that's under the control of the master. Doesn't the script
recreate the entire trunk every time? Oh, of course that would be too
expensive. Ok, I'll edit the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
Justin Mason said:
afaik you can.
Ok, I'll try it. First I'll confirm that I can get the 0.6.2 that I have
installed running again, as I've had it down for a while.
Another question -- Can we have a way of enabling
Justin Mason said:
afaik you can.
Ok, I'll try it. First I'll confirm that I can get the 0.6.2 that I have
installed running again, as I've had it down for a while.
Another question -- Can we have a way of enabling network test for the
buildbot runs? I can see how it should be an option, as
I got past the setuid problem but now I don't see my slave appearing in
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/
I'm trying to run trunk-sidney-cygwin
It got the message from master: attached and then said it was doing a
keepalive, but nothing else.
-- sidney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
I got past the setuid problem but now I don't see my slave appearing in
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org:8010/
I'm trying to run trunk-sidney-cygwin
It got the message from master: attached and then said it was doing
I'd like to contribute some research I've done on spam that doesn't use
traditional bayes filters or other scoring methods nor traditional DNS BLs. Its
either spam or its not, but I'd like to see this technique in spamassasin,
possibly with really high scores for things that this method says are
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:45:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the algorithm:
1 Decode any URL-encoding in the message
2 Un-MIME the message
Wrong order?
3 Scan all parts of the message for URLs and email addresses (this can be
links, IMG tags, mailto:'s, or even just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:45:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the algorithm:
1 Decode any URL-encoding in the message
2 Un-MIME the message
Wrong order?
3 Scan all parts of the message for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|triage |
--- Additional Comments
Quoting Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- - if a spammer were to use a hostname like
jm_at_jmason_dot_org.spamdomain.com, they get a free backchannel to
verify that I was (a) using SpamAssassin to filter to my mail, and (b)
that that address is valid. So blindly resolving the full
On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:01:09 +0100, Henry Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. Faster body scanning.
Every body rule in SpamAssassin requires a separate pass through the
message. The time complexity of this is O(n). If all of the rules
are combined into one using a trie structure, the rules
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --- Forwarded Message
Date:Mon, 23 May 2005 17:14:57 -0700
From:Brian Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Buildbot-devel] buildbot-0.6.6 released
I've just released buildbot-0.6.6, it's available on the
Quoting Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A similar idea, without the back-channel flaw is to test the
domain for either 'CNAME' or 'A' record `wildcards' (as in the command
dig '*.spammer_domain.tld' a and dig '*.spammer_domain.tld' cname).
This is an excellent spam sign (the host
List Mail User wrote:
Legitimate domains will use wildcards for 'NS', 'MX' and even
occasionally for some more obscure records, but an 'A' or 'CNAME'
record is nearly always a spammer.
Do you have any statistics for that? I administer plenty of domains
that have wildcard A records, and I'm
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4263
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 20:06 ---
I will try that. When I reported the bug I was doing the install via CPAN.
Thank, I will let you know
(In reply to comment #2)
Can you please test the current
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4361
Summary: Upgrade doc: Bayes restart clean
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4355
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-23 21:28 ---
is there a sample message this issue is occuring with? I can't find a sample
in my corpus. Is this a
spammer trying to obfuscate, or just qmail/exim/whatever
24 matches
Mail list logo
