[Bug 4401] Oops! user_dirs don't match!

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4401 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-17 06:56 --- Well, that seems to be the best approach, I'm looking forward to that solution. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for

Re: 3.1.0?

2005-06-17 Thread Michael Parker
Justin Mason wrote: Are we ready for a prerelease?Here's all that's remaining in the 3.1.0 queue: +1 Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Bug 4347] many config options are not validated

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4347 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.1.1 --- Additional

Re: 3.1.0?

2005-06-17 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Michael Parker wrote: Justin Mason wrote: Are we ready for a prerelease?Here's all that's remaining in the 3.1.0 queue: +1 Michael +1. The only two I'd like to see in 3.1.0 are 4363 and 4344, neither of which affect mass-checks. Daryl

[Bug 4403] 'NS lookup failed horribly' error with Net::DNS 0.51

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4403 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|spamd fails DNS test with |'NS lookup failed horribly'

[Bug 4403] 'NS lookup failed horribly' error with Net::DNS 0.51

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4403 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-17 18:15 --- The persistent_udp option broke as of Net::DNS version 0.51. Spamassassin 3.1 trunk no longer uses that option, so it happens not to be affected. I reported the

[Bug 4344] RFE: Enhance spamc under Win32 to same timeout behaviour as under Unix

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4344 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-17 19:20 --- I don't like having platform-dependent units for the timeout value -- it'd be better to copy to another int in the #ifdef _WIN32 section in libspamc.c, and scale

Re: 3.1.0?

2005-06-17 Thread Daniel Quinlan
+1 yep Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm still waiting for the logger cleanup that was supposed to happen, but it won't stop a prerelease. Worst case, I'll just change the default from info to warn. (aka: SA needs to stop being so chatty!) It's on my TODO list. Honest. I want

SpamAssassin 3.1.0pre1 PRERELEASE available!

2005-06-17 Thread Justin Mason
hi all -- it's time to broaden the pool of 3.1.0 testing -- so here's a prerelease. It's functionally quite close to what 3.1.0 will be, although we haven't yet done the rescoring mass-checks and Perceptron run, and there may be one or two more patches going in before the full release. We'd

[Bug 4403] 'NS lookup failed horribly' error with Net::DNS 0.51

2005-06-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4403 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: SpamAssassin 3.1.0pre1 PRERELEASE available!

2005-06-17 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, June 17, 2005 7:56 PM -0700 Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL: http://SpamAssassin.apache.org/devel/ How about including a link on the regular download page to the devel page? I usually go there first when looking for a new version. It should probably go near the end,