[Bug 5267] New: DNS requests have bad local unprivileged ports

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5267 Summary: DNS requests have bad local unprivileged ports Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.1.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 5269] New: may need to have separate mirror sets for differing versions of same channel

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 Summary: may need to have separate mirror sets for differing versions of same channel Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other

[Bug 5269] may need to have separate mirror sets for differing versions of same channel

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0 --- Additional

[Bug 5269] may need to have separate mirror sets for differing versions of same channel

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: SA-UPDATE and recent branches/3.1 rules?

Theo Van Dinter writes: On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 02:43:25PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: This is the biggest reason why I'm not yet running 3.2 on my MXes... there's nothing to stop rules with inappropriate scores, or rules that overlap (all with a score of 1, probably) from being

[Bug 5003] spamassassin.spec (separating sa-update et al.)

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 4770] use ASN data as Bayes token

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4770 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-02 10:36 --- so, just to clarify -- the asn.routeviews.org developers are happy for (off-by-default) support to be included in SA? --- You are receiving this mail

SpamAssassin 3.1.7 vs 3.2.0 memory consumption

I've been working a little on reducing RAM consumption for 3.2.0. Here's what it looks like at the moment, measured using a test ruleset and spamd. SpamAssassin 3.1.x -- jm 12333 24936:22372 0 pts/5 0:00 /usr/bin/perl -T -w ../spamd/spamd -D -x -s stderr -C /home/jm/ftp/r

Problem with update for 3.2?

Hello dev, I'm having trouble updating 3.2 for the moment, is this related to the troubles that people were having with the update of 3.1 going bad? Revision 491858 was not found on spamassassin.kulge.net Sorry for the poor formatting, copy and paste just doesn't cut it! [2384] dbg: channel:

Re: Problem with update for 3.2?

Hello Fred, Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 4:40:30 PM, you wrote: Hello dev, I'm having trouble updating 3.2 for the moment, is this related to the troubles that people were having with the update of 3.1 going bad? I ran svn update and tried again things are ok now! Sorry for the chatter! --

[Bug 4770] use ASN data as Bayes token

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4770 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-02 14:21 --- Yes, see comment #20. John Heasly wrote by mail: | I would not expect there to be any problem with the additional load. I'll forward you the complete mail

[Bug 5267] DNS requests have bad local unprivileged ports

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 5264] Specification of DNS-query source port range

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 5269] may need to have separate mirror sets for differing versions of same channel

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5269 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED