[Bug 5149] not recovering from prefork: select returned -1!

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 4332] PMS-{redirect_num} unused / obfu redirection not included

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4332 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|fix before mass-checks | Target Milestone|3.2.0

[Bug 5294] RCVD_IN_XBL should use lastexternal

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||fix before mass-checks

[Bug 5285] remove NJABL DUL rule in favour of PBL

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5285 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-13 12:55 --- freqs: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20070113-r495852-n/RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL/detail 0.0 13.5293 1.2629 0.9150.660.00 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL

Re: svn commit: r433413 - /spamassassin/trunk/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata/Received.pm

Wow, this was a pretty big change in how trusted_networks are inferred. Relays in the same /16 are no longer considered trusted, but the docs still say they are. Daryl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jm Date: Mon Aug 21 16:01:52 2006 New Revision: 433413 URL:

Re: 3.2.0 release schedule

Sounds like an alright schedule to me. It'd be nice to get away with a single RC, but I hope that we have enough people test it that we end up doing a second one. :) Daryl Justin Mason wrote: ping -- anyone there? --j. Justin Mason writes: Happy new year! New year, time for a new major