http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5483
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-27 13:00 ---
I, too, have gotten a FP on this rule. I, too, don't understand why it is a
rule. Here are the headers:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Original-To:
On Samstag, 10. März 2007 Vincent Li wrote:
I happen to have a custom SA plugin to query p0f unix domain socket,
I guess it can be modified to add X-p0f-*** to meta header.
http://bl0g.blogdns.com/sa-p0f-plugin/P0f-X86.pm
Did anybody make further development on this thread?
mfg zmi
--
//
On Dienstag, 13. März 2007 OLIVERES Vivian wrote:
I am french student at ENSSAT (Ecole Nationale Supérieure des
Sciences Appliquées et de Technologies) and, in the context of a data
mining lesson, I need to develop a small application to show the
principe of naive Bayes learning applicated to
Hey folks,
The version of re2c currently in Debian is 0.9.x, and according to the
sa-compile man page, 0.10.x is needed for the Rule2XSBody plugin. As
far as I can tell, sa-compile is working fine with 0.9.x. Anybody know
the reason behind recommending 0.10.x?
--
Duncan Findlay
On 27-May-07, at 4:24 PM, Duncan Findlay wrote:
The version of re2c currently in Debian is 0.9.x, and according to the
sa-compile man page, 0.10.x is needed for the Rule2XSBody plugin. As
far as I can tell, sa-compile is working fine with 0.9.x. Anybody know
the reason behind recommending
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:59:11PM -0400, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Bug fixes. :-)
While I was hacking on the original re2xs that Justin based sa-compile off, I
found some bugs which they fixed in the 0.10.x
series.
But they were just bugs in the code generation, so if it's working fine for
